Alfa RomeoTonale MOT results
In 2025, 94.2% of Alfa Romeo Tonale MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 88.8% for cars of the same age. 1.4% had at least one dangerous defect (3.6% for cars the same age). The typical Alfa Romeo Tonale tested was 3 years old with 17,800 miles. Based on 139 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Alfa Romeo Tonale cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 94.2%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 88.8%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 0.0%passed after repair
- Failed
- 5.8%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 1.4%same age 3.6%
- Typical mileage
- 17,800at the test
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 80 | 95.0% | 87.4% | 20,800 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Alfa Romeo Tonale is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SL Slough | South East | 9 | 6.5% | 9.0× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 6 | 4.3% | 5.4× | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 6 | 4.3% | 3.1× | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 6 | 4.3% | 3.2× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 6 | 4.3% | 4.2× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BS Bristol | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DH Durham | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EN Enfield | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IG Ilford | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| N London N | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NW London NW | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PR Preston | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RG Reading | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SE London SE | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 13 | 9.4% | 1.9× | – |
| North East | 6 | 4.3% | 1.4× | – |
| North West | 13 | 9.4% | 2.0× | – |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 10.1% | 1.9× | – |
| Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| West Midlands | 9 | 6.5% | 1.1× | – |
| East Midlands | 17 | 12.2% | 1.8× | – |
| East of England | 16 | 11.5% | 1.6× | – |
| London | 12 | 8.6% | 1.8× | – |
| South East | 24 | 17.3% | 1.8× | – |
| South West | 11 | 7.9% | 1.3× | – |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 7 defects that failed Alfa Romeo Tonale tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyre pressure monitoring system: malfunctioning or obviously inoperative Tyres | 2.2% | 0.2% | 11× | 0.0% |
| Electronic stability control: warning lamp indicates a fault Brakes | 1.4% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Condition: buckle not functioning as intended Seat belts and airbags | 0.7% | 0.1% | 7.0× | 0.0% |
| Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | 0.7% | 2.0% | 0.4× | 0.0% |
| Malfunction indicator lamp: inoperative or indicates a malfunction Emissions and leaks | 0.7% | 0.3% | 2.3× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 0.7% | 1.1% | 0.6× | 100.0% |
| Undertray: likely to become detached Body and structure Dangerous | 0.7% | 0.0% | – | 100.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 15.1% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 3.6% |
| Condition: slightly damaged | 1.4% |
| Non-component advisories: Nail in tyre | 1.4% |
| Condition: has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords | 0.7% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 0.7% |
| Non-component advisories: Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt | 0.7% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 0.7% |