Aston MartinVantage MOT results
In 2025, 93.7% of Aston Martin Vantage MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 73.7% for cars of the same age. 0.9% had at least one dangerous defect (7.1% for cars the same age). The typical Aston Martin Vantage tested was 9 years old with 21,100 miles. Based on 4,857 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Aston Martin Vantage cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 93.7%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 73.7%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 1.2%passed after repair
- Failed
- 5.1%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 0.9%same age 7.1%
- Typical mileage
- 21,100at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 350 | 95.7% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 322 | 96.9% | 87.2% |
| 2020 | 187 | 94.1% | 85.9% |
| 2019 | 648 | 94.1% | 83.5% |
| 2018 | 433 | 94.0% | 80.8% |
| 2017 | 268 | 92.9% | 78.1% |
| 2016 | 373 | 96.5% | 74.8% |
| 2015 | 334 | 93.4% | 71.8% |
| 2014 | 342 | 95.0% | 68.5% |
| 2013 | 309 | 92.6% | 65.6% |
| 2012 | 174 | 91.4% | 63.2% |
| 2011 | 112 | 90.2% | 61.0% |
| 2010 | 138 | 94.2% | 59.1% |
| 2009 | 147 | 89.1% | 58.1% |
| 2008 | 147 | 89.1% | 57.0% |
| 2007 | 197 | 91.9% | 57.2% |
| 2006 | 271 | 91.5% | 56.8% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 644 | 96.4% | 87.4% | 10,500 |
| 5-9 years | 1,959 | 94.0% | 79.1% | 18,400 |
| 10-14 years | 1,199 | 93.5% | 65.7% | 25,800 |
| 15-19 years | 868 | 90.8% | 57.6% | 43,800 |
| 20-29 years | 15 | 100.0% | 59.6% | 33,500 |
| 30-39 years | 35 | 97.1% | 71.3% | 28,700 |
| 40+ years | 19 | 94.7% | 82.0% | 53,900 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Aston Martin Vantage is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS Bristol | South West | 286 | 5.9% | 3.4× | 93.4% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 281 | 5.8% | 5.5× | 87.2% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 217 | 4.5% | 2.4× | 91.7% |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 214 | 4.4% | 5.3× | 93.5% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 180 | 3.7% | 3.1× | 97.2% |
| RG Reading | South East | 175 | 3.6% | 2.4× | 95.4% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 168 | 3.5% | 2.6× | 93.5% |
| SK Stockport | North West | 167 | 3.4% | 3.4× | 97.6% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 157 | 3.2% | 2.9× | 98.7% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 156 | 3.2% | 2.2× | 93.6% |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 149 | 3.1% | 1.0× | 99.3% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 144 | 3.0% | 2.4× | 94.4% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 129 | 2.7% | 1.6× | 96.9% |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 109 | 2.2% | 5.1× | 91.7% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 103 | 2.1% | 2.0× | 93.2% |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 101 | 2.1% | 2.2× | 98.0% |
| NW London NW | London | 96 | 2.0% | 3.0× | 89.6% |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 90 | 1.9% | 1.5× | 93.3% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 82 | 1.7% | 1.2× | 100.0% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 78 | 1.6% | 1.2× | 96.2% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 75 | 1.5% | 1.1× | 89.3% |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 63 | 1.3% | 1.8× | 96.8% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 60 | 1.2% | 1.2× | 93.3% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 58 | 1.2% | 0.9× | 91.4% |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 53 | 1.1% | 0.7× | 96.2% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 47 | 1.0% | 0.9× | 85.1% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 41 | 0.8% | 0.5× | 95.1% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 40 | 0.8% | 0.6× | 97.5% |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 39 | 0.8% | 1.6× | 87.2% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 38 | 0.8% | 0.4× | 89.5% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 37 | 0.8% | 0.3× | 94.6% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 37 | 0.8% | 0.6× | 94.6% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 36 | 0.7% | 0.7× | 97.2% |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 32 | 0.7% | 2.4× | 93.8% |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 32 | 0.7% | 1.1× | 96.9% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 29 | 0.6% | 0.5× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 29 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 28 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 28 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 27 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 26 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 25 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| CH Chester | North West | 25 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 24 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| SW London SW | London | 24 | 0.5% | 1.2× | – |
| BN Brighton | South East | 23 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 23 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 23 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 22 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 21 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 21 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 21 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 21 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | 21 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 19 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 19 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| W London W | London | 19 | 0.4% | 1.5× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 18 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 17 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 17 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 16 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 16 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 16 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 16 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 16 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 16 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| M Manchester | North West | 15 | 0.3% | 0.2× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 14 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 14 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 13 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 13 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 12 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 12 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | 12 | 0.2% | 0.6× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 12 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 12 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 12 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 11 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 11 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 11 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 11 | 0.2% | 0.6× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 11 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 10 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 10 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 10 | 0.2% | 0.6× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 10 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 10 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 10 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 9 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 9 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 9 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 8 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 8 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 8 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| N London N | London | 8 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 7 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 7 | 0.1% | 0.4× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 7 | 0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 7 | 0.1% | 0.4× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 7 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 6 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| E London E | London | 6 | 0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 5 | 0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 5 | 0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| SM Sutton | London | 5 | 0.1% | 0.5× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 5 | 0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 228 | 4.7% | 0.6× | 93.4% |
| North East | 168 | 3.5% | 0.9× | 96.4% |
| North West | 344 | 7.1% | 0.6× | 94.5% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 327 | 6.7% | 0.7× | 95.7% |
| Wales | 71 | 1.5% | 0.3× | 94.4% |
| West Midlands | 427 | 8.8% | 0.9× | 95.1% |
| East Midlands | 393 | 8.1% | 1.2× | 94.1% |
| East of England | 583 | 12.0% | 1.2× | 95.5% |
| London | 474 | 9.8% | 1.0× | 92.8% |
| South East | 1,179 | 24.3% | 1.6× | 92.3% |
| South West | 662 | 13.6% | 1.3× | 92.0% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Aston Martin Vantage tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headlamp aim: too high Lights and electrics | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9× | 0.0% |
| Malfunction indicator lamp: inoperative or indicates a malfunction Emissions and leaks | 0.6% | 1.4% | 0.4× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: too low Lights and electrics | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Washers: not working Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9× | 0.0% |
| Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | 0.5% | 1.4% | 0.4× | 0.0% |
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 0.4% | 2.1% | 0.2× | 0.0% |
| Coil spring: fractured or broken Suspension | 0.4% | 2.2% | 0.2× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 0.4% | 2.2% | 0.2× | 100.0% |
| Registration plates: does not conform to the specified requirements Identification of the vehicle | 0.3% | 0.1% | 3.0× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 0.2% | 1.8% | 0.1× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 5.9% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 5.1% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 2.2% |
| Non-component advisories: Nail in tyre | 1.5% |
| Condition: webbing slightly damaged or frayed | 1.5% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 1.4% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 1.2% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 0.9% |
| Condition: has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords | 0.7% |
| Flexible brake hoses: has slight corrosion to ferrule | 0.5% |