ChevroletKalos MOT results
In 2025, 47.3% of Chevrolet Kalos MOT tests were passed first time, worse than the 57.1% for cars of the same age. 11.1% had at least one dangerous defect (10.3% for cars the same age). The typical Chevrolet Kalos tested was 18 years old with 64,400 miles. Based on 1,819 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Chevrolet Kalos cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 47.3%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 57.1%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 8.0%passed after repair
- Failed
- 44.6%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 11.1%same age 10.3%
- Typical mileage
- 64,400at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 471 | 43.9% | 57.0% |
| 2007 | 641 | 48.8% | 57.2% |
| 2006 | 398 | 47.5% | 56.8% |
| 2005 | 306 | 49.7% | 57.5% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-19 years | 1,668 | 46.9% | 57.6% | 64,200 |
| 20-29 years | 151 | 52.3% | 59.6% | 67,800 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Chevrolet Kalos is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 87 | 4.8% | 1.5× | 48.3% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 54 | 3.0% | 2.8× | 46.3% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 53 | 2.9% | 1.8× | 39.6% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 45 | 2.5% | 1.4× | 31.1% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 42 | 2.3% | 1.9× | 54.8% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 39 | 2.1% | 1.0× | 53.8% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 37 | 2.0% | 1.7× | 40.5% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 37 | 2.0% | 1.1× | 48.6% |
| M Manchester | North West | 35 | 1.9% | 1.3× | 37.1% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 34 | 1.9% | 1.0× | 41.2% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 34 | 1.9% | 1.4× | 50.0% |
| CH Chester | North West | 31 | 1.7% | 1.5× | 35.5% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 31 | 1.7% | 1.2× | 41.9% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 31 | 1.7% | 2.0× | 67.7% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 30 | 1.6% | 0.9× | 40.0% |
| CR Croydon | London | 29 | 1.6% | 2.4× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 29 | 1.6% | 1.8× | – |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 28 | 1.5% | 1.0× | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 28 | 1.5% | 1.1× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 25 | 1.4% | 1.6× | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | 25 | 1.4% | 1.3× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 25 | 1.4% | 1.8× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 24 | 1.3% | 1.2× | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 24 | 1.3% | 1.0× | – |
| RG Reading | South East | 23 | 1.3% | 0.8× | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 23 | 1.3% | 2.5× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 22 | 1.2% | 1.7× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 22 | 1.2% | 2.0× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 22 | 1.2% | 1.8× | – |
| BN Brighton | South East | 21 | 1.2% | 1.0× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 21 | 1.2% | 1.7× | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 20 | 1.1% | 0.8× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 20 | 1.1% | 1.6× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 20 | 1.1% | 1.0× | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 20 | 1.1% | 1.0× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 20 | 1.1% | 1.7× | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 19 | 1.0% | 0.9× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 19 | 1.0% | 1.0× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 18 | 1.0% | 1.3× | – |
| E London E | London | 18 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 18 | 1.0% | 0.9× | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | 18 | 1.0% | 1.0× | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 18 | 1.0% | 0.9× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 18 | 1.0% | 1.6× | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | 18 | 1.0% | 1.4× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 18 | 1.0% | 1.0× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 18 | 1.0% | 1.4× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 17 | 0.9% | 2.2× | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 17 | 0.9% | 1.6× | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 16 | 0.9% | 0.6× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 15 | 0.8% | 1.5× | – |
| N London N | London | 15 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 14 | 0.8% | 2.0× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 14 | 0.8% | 0.9× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 14 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 14 | 0.8% | 1.1× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 13 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | 13 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 13 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 12 | 0.7% | 0.9× | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 12 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 12 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 12 | 0.7% | 1.1× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 11 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 11 | 0.6% | 1.7× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 11 | 0.6% | 1.0× | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 11 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 11 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 11 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 10 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 9 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 9 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | 9 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 9 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 9 | 0.5% | 0.3× | – |
| NW London NW | London | 9 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 9 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 9 | 0.5% | 1.1× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 8 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 8 | 0.4% | 0.9× | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 7 | 0.4% | 0.2× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 7 | 0.4% | 0.9× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 7 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 7 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| SW London SW | London | 7 | 0.4% | 0.9× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 7 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 6 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 6 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 5 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 5 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| SM Sutton | London | 5 | 0.3% | 1.2× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 5 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 5 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| W London W | London | 5 | 0.3% | 1.0× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DH Durham | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 32 | 1.8% | 0.2× | 50.0% |
| North East | 23 | 1.3% | 0.3× | – |
| North West | 197 | 10.8% | 0.9× | 41.1% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 115 | 6.3% | 0.7× | 50.4% |
| Wales | 105 | 5.8% | 1.2× | 40.0% |
| West Midlands | 229 | 12.6% | 1.3× | 54.6% |
| East Midlands | 126 | 6.9% | 1.0× | 51.6% |
| East of England | 178 | 9.8% | 1.0× | 51.7% |
| London | 217 | 11.9% | 1.3× | 55.8% |
| South East | 299 | 16.4% | 1.1× | 44.8% |
| South West | 298 | 16.4% | 1.6× | 38.6% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Chevrolet Kalos tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | 8.5% | 2.6% | 3.3× | 0.0% |
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 7.1% | 5.9% | 1.2× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 6.9% | 2.2% | 3.1× | 0.0% |
| Track rod end: ball joint has excessive play Steering | 6.3% | 1.8% | 3.5× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 6.0% | 3.8% | 1.6× | 0.0% |
| Service brake performance: excessively binding Brakes | 6.0% | 1.6% | 3.8× | 0.0% |
| Malfunction indicator lamp: inoperative or indicates a malfunction Emissions and leaks | 5.0% | 2.7% | 1.9× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 4.9% | 2.6% | 1.9× | 0.0% |
| Anti-lock braking system: warning lamp indicates an ABS fault Brakes | 4.8% | 1.1% | 4.4× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint: ball joint excessively worn Suspension | 4.0% | 3.0% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 22.3% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 21.3% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 19.3% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 17.4% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 16.7% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 9.8% |
| Service brake performance: binding but not excessively | 9.7% |
| Headlamp: has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output | 9.3% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 8.4% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 6.7% |