FerrariRoma MOT results
In 2025, 94.2% of Ferrari Roma MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 87.9% for cars of the same age. 1.3% had at least one dangerous defect (3.9% for cars the same age). The typical Ferrari Roma tested was 3 years old with 7,600 miles. Based on 382 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Ferrari Roma cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 94.2%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 87.9%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 2.4%passed after repair
- Failed
- 3.4%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 1.3%same age 3.9%
- Typical mileage
- 7,600at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 175 | 93.1% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 201 | 95.0% | 87.2% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 328 | 94.5% | 87.4% | 7,800 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Ferrari Roma is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL St Albans | East of England | 40 | 10.5% | 23.7× | 90.0% |
| TW Twickenham | London | 37 | 9.7% | 13.3× | 97.3% |
| SW London SW | London | 34 | 8.9% | 20.9× | 88.2% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 29 | 7.6% | 6.7× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 28 | 7.3% | 8.2× | – |
| SO Southampton | South East | 24 | 6.3% | 5.1× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 23 | 6.0% | 7.6× | – |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 21 | 5.5% | 1.8× | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 20 | 5.2% | 3.9× | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 14 | 3.7% | 2.0× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 13 | 3.4% | 3.4× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 10 | 2.6% | 2.1× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 7 | 1.8% | 1.6× | – |
| NW London NW | London | 5 | 1.3% | 2.0× | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | 5 | 1.3% | 2.9× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DH Durham | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| E London E | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EN Enfield | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HA Harrow | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IG Ilford | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| M Manchester | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| N London N | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RG Reading | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SL Slough | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TR Truro | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 18 | 4.7% | 1.4× | – |
| North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| North West | 22 | 5.8% | 1.1× | – |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 36 | 9.4% | 1.4× | 94.4% |
| Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| West Midlands | 27 | 7.1% | 1.2× | – |
| East Midlands | 18 | 4.7% | 1.0× | – |
| East of England | 69 | 18.1% | 2.9× | 87.0% |
| London | 85 | 22.3% | 3.7× | 94.1% |
| South East | 62 | 16.2% | 1.1× | 95.2% |
| South West | 43 | 11.3% | 2.0× | 97.7% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Ferrari Roma tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition: has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Dangerous | 1.3% | 0.4% | 3.3× | 100.0% |
| Registration plates: missing Identification of the vehicle | 1.0% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Registration plates: does not conform to the specified requirements Identification of the vehicle | 0.8% | 0.1% | 8.0× | 0.0% |
| Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | 0.5% | 1.9% | 0.3× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: too high Lights and electrics | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Emissions and leaks | 0.3% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: too high and too far to the left. Lights and electrics | 0.3% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Linkage ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension | 0.3% | 0.1% | 3.0× | 0.0% |
| Shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak Suspension | 0.3% | 0.2% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Tyre pressure monitoring system: malfunctioning or obviously inoperative Tyres | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 2.9% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 1.8% |
| Condition: has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords | 1.3% |
| Condition: slightly damaged | 0.5% |
| Non-component advisories: Nail in tyre | 0.5% |
| Condition: slightly distorted | 0.3% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 0.3% |
| Shock absorbers: has light misting of oil | 0.3% |