HondaFIT MOT results
In 2025, 81.0% of Honda FIT MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 65.6% for cars of the same age. 3.2% had at least one dangerous defect (8.7% for cars the same age). The typical Honda FIT tested was 12 years old with 56,900 miles. Based on 5,072 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Honda FIT cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 81.0%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 65.6%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 5.1%passed after repair
- Failed
- 13.9%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 3.2%same age 8.7%
- Typical mileage
- 56,900at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 39 | 74.4% | 91.7% |
| 2018 | 39 | 92.3% | 80.8% |
| 2017 | 63 | 84.1% | 78.1% |
| 2016 | 123 | 84.6% | 74.8% |
| 2015 | 231 | 87.4% | 71.8% |
| 2014 | 893 | 88.9% | 68.5% |
| 2013 | 934 | 85.4% | 65.6% |
| 2012 | 1,228 | 79.8% | 63.2% |
| 2011 | 938 | 76.4% | 61.0% |
| 2010 | 282 | 67.4% | 59.1% |
| 2009 | 70 | 67.1% | 58.1% |
| 2008 | 57 | 64.9% | 57.0% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 37 | 62.2% | 87.4% | 68,800 |
| 5-9 years | 330 | 83.3% | 79.1% | 54,900 |
| 10-14 years | 4,341 | 81.9% | 65.7% | 57,000 |
| 15-19 years | 267 | 69.3% | 57.6% | 60,100 |
| 20-29 years | 18 | 44.4% | 59.6% | 87,400 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Honda FIT is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 604 | 11.9% | 3.8× | 89.1% |
| M Manchester | North West | 288 | 5.7% | 3.8× | 87.8% |
| RM Romford | London | 213 | 4.2% | 5.2× | 87.3% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 193 | 3.8% | 2.1× | 90.2% |
| IG Ilford | London | 173 | 3.4% | 7.8× | 86.1% |
| BL Bolton | North West | 163 | 3.2% | 4.2× | 92.0% |
| E London E | London | 157 | 3.1% | 3.8× | 78.3% |
| UB Southall | London | 148 | 2.9% | 4.7× | 93.9% |
| SL Slough | South East | 125 | 2.5% | 3.4× | 88.8% |
| HA Harrow | London | 115 | 2.3% | 3.8× | 87.0% |
| CR Croydon | London | 88 | 1.7% | 2.6× | 89.8% |
| LU Luton | East of England | 87 | 1.7% | 2.6× | 89.7% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 84 | 1.7% | 0.7× | 86.9% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 82 | 1.6% | 1.3× | 74.4% |
| TW Twickenham | London | 75 | 1.5% | 2.0× | 81.3% |
| RG Reading | South East | 73 | 1.4% | 0.9× | 64.4% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 72 | 1.4% | 1.0× | 76.4% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 71 | 1.4% | 1.0× | 83.1% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 71 | 1.4% | 0.8× | 80.3% |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 68 | 1.3% | 1.4× | 73.5% |
| SE London SE | London | 67 | 1.3% | 1.7× | 80.6% |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 66 | 1.3% | 1.5× | 87.9% |
| N London N | London | 65 | 1.3% | 1.9× | 87.7% |
| NW London NW | London | 61 | 1.2% | 1.8× | 78.7% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 57 | 1.1% | 1.0× | 89.5% |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 55 | 1.1% | 0.7× | 74.5% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 54 | 1.1% | 0.7× | 81.5% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 54 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 57.4% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 53 | 1.0% | 1.0× | 64.2% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 52 | 1.0% | 1.0× | 71.2% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 52 | 1.0% | 0.6× | 82.7% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 48 | 0.9% | 0.6× | 60.4% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 47 | 0.9% | 0.9× | 74.5% |
| SW London SW | London | 45 | 0.9% | 2.1× | 84.4% |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 43 | 0.8% | 1.0× | 90.7% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 42 | 0.8% | 0.7× | 61.9% |
| OL Oldham | North West | 42 | 0.8% | 1.2× | 76.2% |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 41 | 0.8% | 1.0× | 73.2% |
| WA Warrington | North West | 41 | 0.8% | 0.8× | 73.2% |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 40 | 0.8% | 0.9× | 80.0% |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 39 | 0.8% | 1.1× | 89.7% |
| DA Dartford | South East | 37 | 0.7% | 1.0× | 70.3% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 37 | 0.7% | 0.5× | 54.1% |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 36 | 0.7% | 0.6× | 83.3% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 35 | 0.7% | 0.5× | 82.9% |
| L Liverpool | North West | 35 | 0.7% | 0.6× | 80.0% |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 33 | 0.7% | 0.5× | 66.7% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 32 | 0.6% | 0.6× | 75.0% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 31 | 0.6% | 0.4× | 80.6% |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 30 | 0.6% | 1.2× | 83.3% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 29 | 0.6% | 0.4× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 29 | 0.6% | 1.5× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 27 | 0.5% | 0.9× | – |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 27 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 27 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 25 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 22 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 22 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 22 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 21 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| SM Sutton | London | 21 | 0.4% | 1.9× | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 20 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 18 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 18 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 18 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 18 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| W London W | London | 18 | 0.4% | 1.3× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 17 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 16 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 16 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 16 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 15 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| CH Chester | North West | 14 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 14 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 14 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 13 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 12 | 0.2% | 0.7× | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 12 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 12 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 11 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 11 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 10 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 10 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 9 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 9 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 8 | 0.2% | 0.1× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 8 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 8 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 8 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 8 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 7 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 7 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 6 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 6 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 5 | <0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 5 | <0.1% | 0.1× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 5 | <0.1% | 0.1× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TR Truro | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 170 | 3.4% | 0.4× | 68.8% |
| North East | 55 | 1.1% | 0.3× | 76.4% |
| North West | 704 | 13.9% | 1.2× | 85.2% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 297 | 5.9% | 0.7× | 82.8% |
| Wales | 110 | 2.2% | 0.5× | 72.7% |
| West Midlands | 836 | 16.5% | 1.7× | 86.2% |
| East Midlands | 344 | 6.8% | 1.0× | 83.1% |
| East of England | 341 | 6.7% | 0.7× | 76.0% |
| London | 1,326 | 26.1% | 2.8× | 84.8% |
| South East | 747 | 14.7% | 1.0× | 73.9% |
| South West | 142 | 2.8% | 0.3× | 57.7% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Honda FIT tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 2.9% | 3.6% | 0.8× | 0.0% |
| Rear fog lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 2.8% | 0.5% | 5.6× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 2.4% | 1.8% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| Rear fog lamp: does not emit a steady red light Lights and electrics | 1.9% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Rear fog lamp: missing Lights and electrics | 1.8% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Linkage ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Switch: missing Lights and electrics | 1.0% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 1.0% | 2.7% | 0.4× | 100.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 9.0% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 7.3% |
| Headlamp: has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output | 3.5% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 3.0% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 1.7% |
| Non-component advisories: Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt | 1.3% |
| Shock absorbers: has light misting of oil | 1.2% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 1.1% |
| Linkage ball joints: ball joint has slight play | 0.9% |
| Condition: has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords | 0.7% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid | 3,955 | 82.6% |
| Petrol | 1,102 | 75.4% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.