HyundaiMatrix MOT results
In 2025, 52.1% of Hyundai Matrix MOT tests were passed first time, worse than the 57.5% for cars of the same age. 13.7% had at least one dangerous defect (10.1% for cars the same age). The typical Hyundai Matrix tested was 18 years old with 77,000 miles. Based on 2,770 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Hyundai Matrix cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 52.1%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 57.5%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 7.1%passed after repair
- Failed
- 40.8%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 13.7%same age 10.1%
- Typical mileage
- 77,000at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 143 | 53.1% | 59.1% |
| 2009 | 261 | 58.6% | 58.1% |
| 2008 | 364 | 51.9% | 57.0% |
| 2007 | 490 | 47.8% | 57.2% |
| 2006 | 566 | 51.6% | 56.8% |
| 2005 | 465 | 52.9% | 57.5% |
| 2004 | 286 | 50.3% | 57.5% |
| 2003 | 124 | 58.9% | 58.5% |
| 2002 | 59 | 50.8% | 59.4% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-9 years | 2 | 0.0% | 79.1% | 81,400 |
| 10-14 years | 66 | 53.0% | 65.7% | 71,200 |
| 15-19 years | 1,981 | 51.5% | 57.6% | 77,200 |
| 20-29 years | 721 | 53.5% | 59.6% | 76,900 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Hyundai Matrix is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 135 | 4.9% | 3.5× | 48.1% |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 109 | 3.9% | 1.3× | 58.7% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 82 | 3.0% | 1.7× | 47.6% |
| SE London SE | London | 73 | 2.6% | 3.4× | 52.1% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 71 | 2.6% | 2.5× | 35.2% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 70 | 2.5% | 2.1× | 50.0% |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 56 | 2.0% | 2.6× | 55.4% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 55 | 2.0% | 0.9× | 58.2% |
| DA Dartford | South East | 54 | 1.9% | 2.7× | 59.3% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 54 | 1.9% | 1.4× | 46.3% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 51 | 1.8% | 1.0× | 47.1% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 49 | 1.8% | 1.5× | 49.0% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 49 | 1.8% | 2.0× | 63.3% |
| M Manchester | North West | 48 | 1.7% | 1.2× | 52.1% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 48 | 1.7% | 1.6× | 54.2% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 44 | 1.6% | 1.5× | 52.3% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 43 | 1.6% | 0.9× | 53.5% |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 41 | 1.5% | 1.9× | 63.4% |
| N London N | London | 41 | 1.5% | 2.2× | 65.9% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 39 | 1.4% | 1.0× | 51.3% |
| E London E | London | 38 | 1.4% | 1.7× | 44.7% |
| TW Twickenham | London | 38 | 1.4% | 1.9× | 60.5% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 37 | 1.3% | 1.0× | 56.8% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 36 | 1.3% | 1.0× | 38.9% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 35 | 1.3% | 1.1× | 65.7% |
| CR Croydon | London | 34 | 1.2% | 1.8× | 70.6% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 34 | 1.2% | 0.8× | 64.7% |
| HA Harrow | London | 34 | 1.2% | 2.0× | 70.6% |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 34 | 1.2% | 1.1× | 55.9% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 33 | 1.2% | 1.0× | 54.5% |
| NW London NW | London | 32 | 1.2% | 1.7× | 59.4% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 30 | 1.1% | 0.6× | 53.3% |
| RG Reading | South East | 30 | 1.1% | 0.7× | 53.3% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 28 | 1.0% | 0.8× | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 28 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 27 | 1.0% | 0.7× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 27 | 1.0% | 1.7× | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 27 | 1.0% | 1.0× | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | 27 | 1.0% | 0.9× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 27 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 27 | 1.0% | 1.5× | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 24 | 0.9% | 0.6× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 24 | 0.9% | 0.9× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 23 | 0.8% | 2.0× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 22 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 22 | 0.8% | 0.7× | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | 22 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 21 | 0.8% | 2.1× | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 21 | 0.8% | 0.5× | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 20 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 20 | 0.7% | 1.2× | – |
| CH Chester | North West | 19 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 19 | 0.7% | 0.4× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 19 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 19 | 0.7% | 0.5× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 19 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 19 | 0.7% | 1.4× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 19 | 0.7% | 1.7× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 19 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 18 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 18 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 18 | 0.6% | 1.1× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 18 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 17 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 17 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| SW London SW | London | 17 | 0.6% | 1.4× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 16 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 16 | 0.6% | 1.0× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 16 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 16 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 15 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 15 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| SM Sutton | London | 15 | 0.5% | 2.4× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 14 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 14 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 14 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 13 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 12 | 0.4% | 1.1× | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 12 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 12 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 11 | 0.4% | 0.9× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 11 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 11 | 0.4% | 0.9× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 11 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 10 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 10 | 0.4% | 1.0× | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 10 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 9 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 8 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 7 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 7 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 6 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 6 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 6 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 44 | 1.6% | 0.2× | 34.1% |
| North East | 47 | 1.7% | 0.4× | 53.2% |
| North West | 230 | 8.3% | 0.7× | 46.1% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 158 | 5.7% | 0.7× | 53.8% |
| Wales | 84 | 3.0% | 0.6× | 47.6% |
| West Midlands | 274 | 9.9% | 1.0× | 58.4% |
| East Midlands | 146 | 5.3% | 0.8× | 50.0% |
| East of England | 334 | 12.1% | 1.2× | 54.8% |
| London | 464 | 16.8% | 1.8× | 57.8% |
| South East | 654 | 23.6% | 1.5× | 52.8% |
| South West | 335 | 12.1% | 1.2× | 42.4% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Hyundai Matrix tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 10.8% | 3.1% | 3.5× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint: ball joint excessively worn Suspension | 6.0% | 3.0% | 2.0× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 5.4% | 3.7% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| SRS malfunction indicator lamp: warning lamp indicates a fault Seat belts and airbags | 4.7% | 1.1% | 4.3× | 0.0% |
| Sub-frame: corroded and seriously weakened Suspension | 4.7% | 0.3% | 16× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 4.3% | 2.7% | 1.6× | 0.0% |
| Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded Brakes | 3.7% | 1.7% | 2.2× | 0.0% |
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 3.5% | 5.7% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 3.4% | 2.7% | 1.3× | 100.0% |
| Service brake performance: excessively binding Brakes | 3.0% | 1.6% | 1.9× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 23.5% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 22.9% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 12.6% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 12.3% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 9.4% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 9.0% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 7.6% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 7.4% |
| Shock absorbers: has light misting of oil | 6.9% |
| Headlamp: has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output | 6.6% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol | 2,578 | 52.5% |
| Diesel | 189 | 46.6% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.