HyundaiVeloster MOT results
In 2025, 60.9% of Hyundai Veloster MOT tests were passed first time, worse than the 64.4% for cars of the same age. 10.1% had at least one dangerous defect (9.0% for cars the same age). The typical Hyundai Veloster tested was 12 years old with 78,000 miles. Based on 2,431 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Hyundai Veloster cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 60.9%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 64.4%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 4.7%passed after repair
- Failed
- 34.4%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 10.1%same age 9.0%
- Typical mileage
- 78,000at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 136 | 69.9% | 68.5% |
| 2013 | 829 | 59.7% | 65.6% |
| 2012 | 1,421 | 60.7% | 63.2% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-9 years | 12 | 75.0% | 79.1% | 33,800 |
| 10-14 years | 2,419 | 60.9% | 65.7% | 78,100 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Hyundai Veloster is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 121 | 5.0% | 1.6× | 72.7% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 59 | 2.4% | 1.4× | 74.6% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 58 | 2.4% | 1.4× | 48.3% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 57 | 2.3% | 1.0× | 68.4% |
| M Manchester | North West | 55 | 2.3% | 1.5× | 58.2% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 51 | 2.1% | 1.3× | 49.0% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 49 | 2.0% | 1.1× | 67.3% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 48 | 2.0% | 1.4× | 62.5% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 41 | 1.7% | 1.1× | 70.7% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 41 | 1.7% | 1.2× | 56.1% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 40 | 1.6% | 0.9× | 75.0% |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 39 | 1.6% | 1.0× | 51.3% |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 39 | 1.6% | 2.2× | 43.6% |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 38 | 1.6% | 1.2× | 57.9% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 38 | 1.6% | 1.2× | 63.2% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 37 | 1.5% | 1.4× | 67.6% |
| CH Chester | North West | 34 | 1.4% | 1.3× | 61.8% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 34 | 1.4% | 1.2× | 76.5% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 34 | 1.4% | 1.1× | 50.0% |
| NP Newport | Wales | 33 | 1.4% | 1.5× | 54.5% |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 32 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 56.2% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 31 | 1.3% | 0.8× | 61.3% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 29 | 1.2% | 1.0× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 28 | 1.2% | 0.9× | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 28 | 1.2% | 1.0× | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 27 | 1.1% | 0.9× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 27 | 1.1% | 2.2× | – |
| RG Reading | South East | 27 | 1.1% | 0.7× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 26 | 1.1% | 1.0× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 25 | 1.0% | 1.0× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 25 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 25 | 1.0% | 1.5× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 24 | 1.0% | 2.3× | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 24 | 1.0% | 0.7× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 23 | 0.9% | 1.4× | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | 23 | 0.9% | 0.7× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 23 | 0.9% | 1.0× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 23 | 0.9% | 0.8× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 22 | 0.9% | 1.0× | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | 22 | 0.9% | 1.2× | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 21 | 0.9% | 0.9× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 21 | 0.9% | 1.5× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 21 | 0.9% | 1.3× | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 21 | 0.9% | 0.6× | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | 21 | 0.9% | 1.9× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 21 | 0.9% | 0.8× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 21 | 0.9% | 0.9× | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | 20 | 0.8% | 0.7× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 20 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 19 | 0.8% | 1.0× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 19 | 0.8% | 1.3× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 19 | 0.8% | 1.1× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 19 | 0.8% | 1.0× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 18 | 0.7% | 0.9× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 18 | 0.7% | 1.1× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 18 | 0.7% | 1.3× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 18 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 17 | 0.7% | 0.9× | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 17 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 17 | 0.7% | 1.3× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 17 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 17 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 17 | 0.7% | 1.1× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 17 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 16 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 16 | 0.7% | 1.1× | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 16 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 16 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 16 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 16 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 15 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 15 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| N London N | London | 15 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| NW London NW | London | 15 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 15 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 15 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 14 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | 14 | 0.6% | 1.4× | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 14 | 0.6% | 1.1× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 1.3× | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | 13 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 12 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 12 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| E London E | London | 12 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 12 | 0.5% | 0.9× | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 12 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 11 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 11 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 11 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 10 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | 10 | 0.4% | 1.7× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 10 | 0.4% | 0.9× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 9 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 9 | 0.4% | 1.1× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 8 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 8 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 8 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 8 | 0.3% | 0.9× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 7 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 7 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 7 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| SW London SW | London | 7 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 6 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | 5 | 0.2% | 0.9× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 5 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 5 | 0.2% | 0.7× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SM Sutton | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TR Truro | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 222 | 9.1% | 1.2× | 54.1% |
| North East | 80 | 3.3% | 0.8× | 50.0% |
| North West | 299 | 12.3% | 1.1× | 60.5% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 206 | 8.5% | 0.9× | 60.7% |
| Wales | 132 | 5.4% | 1.1× | 47.0% |
| West Midlands | 319 | 13.1% | 1.3× | 65.8% |
| East Midlands | 196 | 8.1% | 1.2× | 64.8% |
| East of England | 211 | 8.7% | 0.9× | 64.0% |
| London | 207 | 8.5% | 0.9× | 72.5% |
| South East | 341 | 14.0% | 0.9× | 61.3% |
| South West | 218 | 9.0% | 0.9× | 56.0% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Hyundai Veloster tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Track rod end: ball joint has excessive play Steering | 8.4% | 1.9% | 4.4× | 0.0% |
| Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements Brakes | 6.4% | 1.4% | 4.6× | 0.0% |
| Coil spring: fractured or broken Suspension | 4.4% | 4.0% | 1.1× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp: not working on dipped beam Lights and electrics | 4.1% | 2.0% | 2.1× | 0.0% |
| Parking brake performance: inoperative on one side Brakes | 3.6% | 0.7% | 5.1× | 0.0% |
| Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 3.0% | 1.7% | 1.8× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 2.8% | 2.7% | 1.0× | 100.0% |
| Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Dangerous | 2.2% | 2.1% | 1.0× | 100.0% |
| SRS malfunction indicator lamp: warning lamp indicates a fault Seat belts and airbags | 2.2% | 0.6% | 3.7× | 0.0% |
| Tyre pressure monitoring system: malfunctioning or obviously inoperative Tyres | 2.2% | 0.2% | 11× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 16.0% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 11.6% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 10.6% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 8.1% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 7.3% |
| Track rod end: ball joint has slight play | 6.6% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 4.4% |
| Coil spring: corroded | 4.2% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 4.2% |
| Service brake performance: binding but not excessively | 4.2% |