IsuzuBighorn MOT results
In 2025, 56.9% of Isuzu Bighorn MOT tests were passed first time, worse than the 61.0% for cars of the same age. 9.4% had at least one dangerous defect (8.6% for cars the same age). The typical Isuzu Bighorn tested was 21 years old with 168,800 miles. Based on 160 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Isuzu Bighorn cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 56.9%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 61.0%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 8.1%passed after repair
- Failed
- 35.0%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 9.4%same age 8.6%
- Typical mileage
- 168,800at the test
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-14 years | 2 | 100.0% | 65.7% | 171,400 |
| 15-19 years | 37 | 70.3% | 57.6% | 159,600 |
| 20-29 years | 96 | 53.1% | 59.6% | 172,600 |
| 30-39 years | 25 | 48.0% | 71.3% | 182,100 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Isuzu Bighorn is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS Bristol | South West | 6 | 3.8% | 2.2× | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 6 | 3.8% | 2.7× | – |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 6 | 3.8% | 2.7× | – |
| SO Southampton | South East | 6 | 3.8% | 3.1× | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 6 | 3.8% | 2.8× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 5 | 3.1% | 2.8× | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 5 | 3.1% | 2.5× | – |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 5 | 3.1% | 1.8× | – |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BA Bath | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BN Brighton | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CH Chester | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EN Enfield | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| M Manchester | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PR Preston | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RM Romford | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TR Truro | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| UB Southall | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 10 | 6.3% | 1.5× | – |
| North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| North West | 22 | 13.8% | 1.4× | – |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 5 | 3.1% | 0.5× | – |
| Wales | 12 | 7.5% | 1.6× | – |
| West Midlands | 9 | 5.6% | 0.6× | – |
| East Midlands | 10 | 6.3% | 0.9× | – |
| East of England | 20 | 12.5% | 1.6× | – |
| London | 6 | 3.8% | 1.1× | – |
| South East | 28 | 17.5% | 1.4× | – |
| South West | 35 | 21.9% | 2.1× | 51.4% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Isuzu Bighorn tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear fog lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 10.0% | 1.6% | 6.3× | 0.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a major leak of exhaust gases Body and structure | 5.0% | 1.9% | 2.6× | 0.0% |
| Stop lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 5.0% | 3.3% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: too low Lights and electrics | 3.8% | 1.7% | 2.2× | 0.0% |
| Individual direction indicators: not working Lights and electrics | 3.1% | 0.7% | 4.4× | 0.0% |
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.2× | 0.0% |
| Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded Brakes | 3.1% | 1.8% | 1.7× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension | 2.5% | 1.6% | 1.6× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 2.5% | 3.1% | 0.8× | 0.0% |
| Vehicle structure: excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting Body and structure | 2.5% | 0.1% | 25× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 35.0% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 28.7% |
| Wheel bearings: has slight play | 21.2% |
| Chassis condition: is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced | 18.1% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 11.2% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 10.6% |
| Non-component advisories: Fuel Pipe/s corroded | 10.6% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 8.1% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 7.5% |
| Chassis condition: or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security | 6.2% |