JaguarEagle MOT results
In 2025, 85.0% of Jaguar Eagle MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 72.4% for cars of the same age. 3.7% had at least one dangerous defect (7.4% for cars the same age). The typical Jaguar Eagle tested was 9 years old with 45,700 miles. Based on 887 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Jaguar Eagle cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 85.0%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 72.4%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 2.5%passed after repair
- Failed
- 12.5%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 3.7%same age 7.4%
- Typical mileage
- 45,700at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 59 | 89.8% | 85.9% |
| 2019 | 73 | 93.2% | 83.5% |
| 2018 | 79 | 91.1% | 80.8% |
| 2017 | 88 | 87.5% | 78.1% |
| 2016 | 74 | 91.9% | 74.8% |
| 2015 | 93 | 88.2% | 71.8% |
| 2014 | 85 | 84.7% | 68.5% |
| 2013 | 83 | 85.5% | 65.6% |
| 2012 | 90 | 82.2% | 63.2% |
| 2011 | 44 | 75.0% | 61.0% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 52 | 88.5% | 87.4% | 18,000 |
| 5-9 years | 401 | 90.8% | 79.1% | 33,800 |
| 10-14 years | 355 | 83.1% | 65.7% | 59,400 |
| 15-19 years | 73 | 63.0% | 57.6% | 83,800 |
| 20-29 years | 5 | 40.0% | 59.6% | 84,400 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Jaguar Eagle is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 44 | 5.0% | 1.6× | 93.2% |
| SE London SE | London | 34 | 3.8% | 4.9× | 79.4% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 32 | 3.6% | 2.4× | 81.2% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 24 | 2.7% | 2.4× | – |
| RG Reading | South East | 21 | 2.4% | 1.6× | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | 21 | 2.4% | 2.3× | – |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 18 | 2.0% | 1.1× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 18 | 2.0% | 1.6× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 16 | 1.8% | 3.9× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 15 | 1.7% | 3.4× | – |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 15 | 1.7% | 0.8× | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 14 | 1.6% | 1.1× | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 1.6% | 1.2× | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | 14 | 1.6% | 1.2× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 14 | 1.6% | 1.8× | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 14 | 1.6% | 1.4× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 13 | 1.5% | 1.9× | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 13 | 1.5% | 0.9× | – |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 13 | 1.5% | 0.8× | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 13 | 1.5% | 1.1× | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 13 | 1.5% | 1.1× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 13 | 1.5% | 1.8× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 12 | 1.4% | 3.1× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 12 | 1.4% | 2.0× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 12 | 1.4% | 1.1× | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 12 | 1.4% | 1.4× | – |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 12 | 1.4% | 1.0× | – |
| CH Chester | North West | 11 | 1.2% | 1.1× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 11 | 1.2% | 1.7× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 11 | 1.2% | 1.8× | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | 11 | 1.2% | 1.2× | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 10 | 1.1% | 0.9× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 10 | 1.1% | 1.2× | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 10 | 1.1% | 1.3× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 10 | 1.1% | 3.0× | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 10 | 1.1% | 0.9× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 10 | 1.1% | 1.2× | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 9 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 9 | 1.0% | 1.1× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 9 | 1.0% | 1.8× | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 9 | 1.0% | 0.6× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 9 | 1.0% | 1.4× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 9 | 1.0% | 1.6× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 8 | 0.9% | 1.2× | – |
| E London E | London | 8 | 0.9% | 1.1× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 8 | 0.9% | 1.7× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 8 | 0.9% | 0.9× | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 7 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| BS Bristol | South West | 7 | 0.8% | 0.5× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 7 | 0.8% | 1.3× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 7 | 0.8% | 1.0× | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 7 | 0.8% | 0.7× | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 7 | 0.8% | 0.5× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 7 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 7 | 0.8% | 1.1× | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 7 | 0.8% | 2.4× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 7 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 7 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 7 | 0.8% | 1.1× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 6 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 6 | 0.7% | 1.6× | – |
| N London N | London | 6 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 6 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 6 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 5 | 0.6% | 1.4× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 5 | 0.6% | 0.5× | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 5 | 0.6% | 0.5× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 5 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 5 | 0.6% | 0.5× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 5 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BA Bath | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HA Harrow | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IG Ilford | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| M Manchester | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NW London NW | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SO Southampton | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TR Truro | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 51 | 5.7% | 0.8× | 82.4% |
| North East | 43 | 4.8% | 1.2× | 93.0% |
| North West | 95 | 10.7% | 0.9× | 86.3% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 53 | 6.0% | 0.7× | 90.6% |
| Wales | 54 | 6.1% | 1.3× | 90.7% |
| West Midlands | 130 | 14.7% | 1.6× | 90.0% |
| East Midlands | 58 | 6.5% | 0.9× | 81.0% |
| East of England | 93 | 10.5% | 1.0× | 84.9% |
| London | 103 | 11.6% | 1.5× | 81.6% |
| South East | 153 | 17.2% | 1.2× | 77.1% |
| South West | 54 | 6.1% | 0.6× | 88.9% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Jaguar Eagle tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malfunction indicator lamp: inoperative or indicates a malfunction Emissions and leaks | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.1× | 0.0% |
| Registration plate lamp(s): inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps Lights and electrics | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Coil spring: fractured or broken Suspension | 1.5% | 2.6% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Condition: has ply or cords exposed Tyres Dangerous | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.2× | 100.0% |
| Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.9× | 0.0% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.7× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 1.0% | 2.3% | 0.4× | 100.0% |
| Headlamp aim: too low Lights and electrics | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.7× | 0.0% |
| Electronic stability control: warning lamp indicates a fault Brakes | 0.7% | 0.2% | 3.5× | 0.0% |
| Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.5× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 21.6% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 5.3% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 5.0% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 3.0% |
| Brake discs: worn, but not excessively | 2.0% |
| Condition: has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords | 1.7% |
| Condition: slightly damaged | 1.7% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 1.7% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 1.6% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 1.6% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 656 | 86.4% |
| Petrol | 231 | 81.0% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.