LanciaFulvia MOT results
In 2025, 91.2% of Lancia Fulvia MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 81.8% for cars of the same age. 2.5% had at least one dangerous defect (4.1% for cars the same age). The typical Lancia Fulvia tested was 52 years old with 47,400 miles. Based on 80 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Lancia Fulvia cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 91.2%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 81.8%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 0.0%passed after repair
- Failed
- 8.8%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 2.5%same age 4.1%
- Typical mileage
- 47,400at the test
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
By age at the test
Lancia FulviaAll cars that age
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-9 years | 7 | 85.7% | 79.1% | 31,500 |
| 10-14 years | 3 | 100.0% | 65.7% | 39,700 |
| 20-29 years | 2 | 100.0% | 59.6% | 52,100 |
| 30-39 years | 1 | 0.0% | 71.3% | 75,400 |
| 40+ years | 67 | 92.5% | 82.0% | 48,600 |
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Lancia Fulvia is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RG Reading | South East | 9 | 11.3% | 7.4× | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 5 | 6.3% | 5.1× | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 5 | 6.3% | 4.7× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BA Bath | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BN Brighton | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CH Chester | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CR Croydon | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EN Enfield | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PR Preston | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SO Southampton | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TR Truro | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| East of England | 9 | 11.3% | 1.8× | – |
| London | 10 | 12.5% | 5.3× | – |
| South East | 26 | 32.5% | 2.9× | – |
| South West | 11 | 13.8% | 2.8× | – |
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
Lancia FulviaCars the same age
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Lancia Fulvia tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 2.5% | 0.5% | 5.0× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint: has excessive play Steering | 1.2% | 0.1% | 12× | 0.0% |
| Brake performance not tested: unable to be tested Brakes | 1.2% | 0.2% | 6.0× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 1.2% | 0.8% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 1.2% | 0.7% | 1.7× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: too low and too far to the left. Lights and electrics | 1.2% | 0.1% | 12× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp: not working on main beam Lights and electrics | 1.2% | 0.9% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| Hydraulic brake callipers: leaking Brakes | 1.2% | 0.1% | 12× | 0.0% |
| Integral vehicle structure condition: corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body and structure | 1.2% | 0.3% | 4.0× | 0.0% |
| Locking devices: locking device ineffective Steering | 1.2% | 0.1% | 12× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 8.8% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 5.0% |
| Shock absorbers: has a slightly worn bush | 5.0% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 2.5% |
| Integral vehicle structure condition: is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced | 2.5% |
| Linkage pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 2.5% |
| Service brake performance: binding but not excessively | 2.5% |
| Service brake performance: fluctuating, but not excessively | 2.5% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 2.5% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 1.2% |