Mercedes300 MOT results
In 2025, 78.2% of Mercedes 300 MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 72.1% for cars of the same age. 4.0% had at least one dangerous defect (5.5% for cars the same age). The typical Mercedes 300 tested was 35 years old with 105,000 miles. Based on 2,623 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Mercedes 300 cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 78.2%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 72.1%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 3.6%passed after repair
- Failed
- 18.3%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 4.0%same age 5.5%
- Typical mileage
- 105,000at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 181 | 72.9% | 68.6% |
| 1992 | 351 | 77.5% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 337 | 74.8% | 71.7% |
| 1990 | 273 | 74.0% | 72.7% |
| 1989 | 521 | 81.0% | 73.4% |
| 1988 | 366 | 79.8% | 73.5% |
| 1987 | 278 | 83.8% | 74.3% |
| 1986 | 161 | 77.0% | 73.6% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 4 | 100.0% | 87.4% | 22,900 |
| 5-9 years | 14 | 92.9% | 79.1% | 39,400 |
| 10-14 years | 15 | 60.0% | 65.7% | 151,400 |
| 15-19 years | 21 | 71.4% | 57.6% | 75,600 |
| 20-29 years | 24 | 83.3% | 59.6% | 114,600 |
| 30-39 years | 2,508 | 78.0% | 71.3% | 105,400 |
| 40+ years | 36 | 86.1% | 82.0% | 94,100 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Mercedes 300 is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 69 | 2.6% | 0.8× | 79.7% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 68 | 2.6% | 2.0× | 83.8% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 67 | 2.6% | 1.7× | 92.5% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 55 | 2.1% | 1.5× | 85.5% |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 53 | 2.0% | 2.5× | 79.2% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 51 | 1.9% | 1.6× | 88.2% |
| RG Reading | South East | 51 | 1.9% | 1.3× | 80.4% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 50 | 1.9% | 1.6× | 72.0% |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 49 | 1.9% | 1.9× | 81.6% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 49 | 1.9% | 1.4× | 79.6% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 49 | 1.9% | 0.8× | 77.6% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 47 | 1.8% | 1.0× | 83.0% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 46 | 1.8% | 1.0× | 78.3% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 44 | 1.7% | 1.6× | 70.5% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 43 | 1.6% | 0.9× | 72.1% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 40 | 1.5% | 1.1× | 75.0% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 38 | 1.4% | 1.4× | 65.8% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 38 | 1.4% | 1.2× | 78.9% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 38 | 1.4% | 0.9× | 68.4% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 38 | 1.4% | 1.3× | 71.1% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 37 | 1.4% | 1.0× | 62.2% |
| TW Twickenham | London | 37 | 1.4% | 1.9× | 70.3% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 35 | 1.3% | 1.1× | 71.4% |
| NW London NW | London | 35 | 1.3% | 2.0× | 80.0% |
| UB Southall | London | 35 | 1.3% | 2.2× | 94.3% |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 35 | 1.3% | 1.4× | 80.0% |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 34 | 1.3% | 1.8× | 76.5% |
| SL Slough | South East | 34 | 1.3% | 1.8× | 85.3% |
| EX Exeter | South West | 33 | 1.3% | 1.1× | 63.6% |
| N London N | London | 32 | 1.2% | 1.8× | 84.4% |
| EN Enfield | London | 31 | 1.2% | 2.0× | 96.8% |
| RM Romford | London | 30 | 1.1% | 1.4× | 83.3% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 30 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 80.0% |
| SW London SW | London | 30 | 1.1% | 2.7× | 66.7% |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 28 | 1.1% | 1.5× | – |
| E London E | London | 28 | 1.1% | 1.3× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 28 | 1.1% | 1.1× | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 27 | 1.0% | 0.6× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 27 | 1.0% | 1.3× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 26 | 1.0% | 1.3× | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 26 | 1.0% | 0.9× | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 26 | 1.0% | 0.9× | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 26 | 1.0% | 1.1× | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | 24 | 0.9% | 0.9× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 23 | 0.9% | 1.3× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 23 | 0.9% | 0.7× | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 23 | 0.9% | 0.8× | – |
| W London W | London | 23 | 0.9% | 3.3× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 22 | 0.8% | 1.9× | – |
| M Manchester | North West | 22 | 0.8% | 0.6× | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 22 | 0.8% | 1.4× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 21 | 0.8% | 1.0× | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 21 | 0.8% | 0.6× | – |
| BS Bristol | South West | 20 | 0.8% | 0.4× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 20 | 0.8% | 1.3× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 20 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 19 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 19 | 0.7% | 0.5× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 19 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 19 | 0.7% | 1.1× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 18 | 0.7% | 1.2× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 18 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 17 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 16 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 16 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 16 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 16 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 15 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 15 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 15 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 15 | 0.6% | 1.5× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 15 | 0.6% | 1.2× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 15 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 14 | 0.5% | 1.5× | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 14 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 14 | 0.5% | 1.4× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 14 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 14 | 0.5% | 0.9× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 14 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| CH Chester | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 13 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 13 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 12 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 11 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 11 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 11 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 10 | 0.4% | 1.4× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 10 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 10 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 9 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 9 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 9 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 9 | 0.3% | 0.9× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 8 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | 8 | 0.3% | 1.0× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 8 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 7 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 7 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 7 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 7 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 7 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 6 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 6 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 6 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 5 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SM Sutton | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ZE Shetland | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 119 | 4.5% | 0.6× | 77.3% |
| North East | 79 | 3.0% | 0.8× | 73.4% |
| North West | 170 | 6.5% | 0.6× | 81.2% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 190 | 7.2% | 0.8× | 79.5% |
| Wales | 81 | 3.1% | 0.6× | 76.5% |
| West Midlands | 260 | 9.9% | 1.0× | 81.5% |
| East Midlands | 156 | 5.9% | 0.9× | 78.2% |
| East of England | 333 | 12.7% | 1.2× | 78.7% |
| London | 443 | 16.9% | 1.8× | 80.4% |
| South East | 536 | 20.4% | 1.3× | 78.5% |
| South West | 254 | 9.7% | 0.9× | 68.9% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Mercedes 300 tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headlamp aim: too low Lights and electrics | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4× | 0.0% |
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 1.9% | 2.7% | 0.7× | 0.0% |
| Rear fog lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 1.6% | 2.5% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 1.6% | 2.0% | 0.8× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension | 1.6% | 0.8% | 2.0× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 1.5% | 2.7% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Non catalyst emissions: emissions carbon monoxide content excessive Emissions and leaks | 1.4% | 2.0% | 0.7× | 0.0% |
| Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 1.4% | 1.5% | 0.9× | 0.0% |
| Stop lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 1.1% | 1.5% | 0.7× | 0.0% |
| Service brake performance: excessively binding Brakes | 1.1% | 1.6% | 0.7× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 14.5% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 10.9% |
| Coil spring: corroded | 7.4% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 6.6% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 5.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 4.8% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 4.6% |
| Wheel bearings: has slight play | 4.3% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 3.2% |
| Transmission oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 2.9% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol | 2,166 | 80.1% |
| Diesel | 443 | 68.2% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.