MGMGF MOT results
In 2025, 66.7% of MG MGF MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 63.4% for cars of the same age. 6.4% had at least one dangerous defect (7.6% for cars the same age). The typical MG MGF tested was 25 years old with 63,700 miles. Based on 5,203 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many MG MGF cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 66.7%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 63.4%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 4.1%passed after repair
- Failed
- 29.3%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 6.4%same age 7.6%
- Typical mileage
- 63,700at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 123 | 65.9% | 59.4% |
| 2001 | 1,495 | 69.1% | 60.9% |
| 2000 | 870 | 65.4% | 62.2% |
| 1999 | 767 | 66.6% | 64.2% |
| 1998 | 755 | 65.8% | 65.1% |
| 1997 | 627 | 66.7% | 66.4% |
| 1996 | 457 | 62.4% | 66.9% |
| 1995 | 66 | 65.2% | 67.6% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-19 years | 7 | 85.7% | 57.6% | 41,500 |
| 20-29 years | 5,180 | 66.6% | 59.6% | 63,700 |
| 30-39 years | 6 | 66.7% | 71.3% | 78,600 |
| 40+ years | 10 | 80.0% | 82.0% | 36,300 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the MG MGF is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 198 | 3.8% | 2.0× | 74.2% |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 162 | 3.1% | 1.0× | 69.1% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 130 | 2.5% | 1.8× | 64.6% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 124 | 2.4% | 1.7× | 69.4% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 105 | 2.0% | 1.8× | 67.6% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 105 | 2.0% | 0.9× | 76.2% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 104 | 2.0% | 1.5× | 75.0% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 93 | 1.8% | 1.5× | 69.9% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 92 | 1.8% | 1.3× | 65.2% |
| RG Reading | South East | 91 | 1.7% | 1.2× | 68.1% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 90 | 1.7% | 1.4× | 63.3% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 90 | 1.7% | 1.3× | 71.1% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 88 | 1.7% | 1.6× | 50.0% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 88 | 1.7% | 1.4× | 72.7% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 87 | 1.7% | 1.1× | 66.7% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 86 | 1.7% | 0.9× | 68.6% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 84 | 1.6% | 1.4× | 69.0% |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 83 | 1.6% | 2.3× | 74.7% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 77 | 1.5% | 1.1× | 66.2% |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 77 | 1.5% | 1.6× | 62.3% |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 76 | 1.5% | 1.1× | 61.8% |
| EX Exeter | South West | 75 | 1.4% | 1.3× | 42.7% |
| SN Swindon | South West | 75 | 1.4% | 1.6× | 60.0% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 73 | 1.4% | 1.2× | 56.2% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 71 | 1.4% | 0.8× | 60.6% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 70 | 1.3% | 0.8× | 72.9% |
| TA Taunton | South West | 70 | 1.3% | 2.1× | 61.4% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 68 | 1.3% | 1.3× | 77.9% |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 67 | 1.3% | 1.6× | 68.7% |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 66 | 1.3% | 1.7× | 63.6% |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 65 | 1.2% | 1.3× | 75.4% |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 64 | 1.2% | 1.8× | 70.3% |
| BA Bath | South West | 63 | 1.2% | 1.4× | 58.7% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 60 | 1.2% | 1.1× | 58.3% |
| PR Preston | North West | 60 | 1.2% | 1.3× | 55.0% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 60 | 1.2% | 1.3× | 76.7% |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 59 | 1.1% | 1.7× | 76.3% |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 58 | 1.1% | 1.5× | 60.3% |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 58 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 55.2% |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 54 | 1.0% | 1.3× | 81.5% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 54 | 1.0% | 1.0× | 66.7% |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 54 | 1.0% | 0.9× | 55.6% |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 49 | 0.9% | 1.7× | 53.1% |
| SK Stockport | North West | 48 | 0.9% | 0.9× | 83.3% |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 48 | 0.9% | 1.6× | 66.7% |
| OL Oldham | North West | 47 | 0.9% | 1.3× | 48.9% |
| TS Teesside | North East | 47 | 0.9% | 1.0× | 68.1% |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 46 | 0.9% | 0.9× | 58.7% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 46 | 0.9% | 0.5× | 60.9% |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 46 | 0.9% | 1.3× | 60.9% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 44 | 0.8% | 0.5× | 65.9% |
| NP Newport | Wales | 44 | 0.8% | 1.0× | 59.1% |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 44 | 0.8% | 0.8× | 63.6% |
| SL Slough | South East | 43 | 0.8% | 1.2× | 69.8% |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 42 | 0.8% | 1.2× | 71.4% |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 42 | 0.8% | 1.1× | 66.7% |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 41 | 0.8% | 1.7× | 53.7% |
| WA Warrington | North West | 39 | 0.7% | 0.7× | 76.9% |
| CH Chester | North West | 38 | 0.7% | 0.7× | 71.1% |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 36 | 0.7% | 0.6× | 75.0% |
| CW Crewe | North West | 35 | 0.7% | 1.1× | 51.4% |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 35 | 0.7% | 1.7× | 57.1% |
| TR Truro | South West | 35 | 0.7% | 1.1× | 57.1% |
| DL Darlington | North East | 34 | 0.7% | 1.1× | 73.5% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 34 | 0.7% | 0.6× | 58.8% |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 33 | 0.6% | 1.5× | 78.8% |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 33 | 0.6% | 1.3× | 54.5% |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 28 | 0.5% | 1.4× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 27 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 26 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 24 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 24 | 0.5% | 1.2× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 24 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 23 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 22 | 0.4% | 1.0× | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 22 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 22 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 21 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 21 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 20 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| M Manchester | North West | 20 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 19 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 19 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 18 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 18 | 0.3% | 1.2× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 17 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 17 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 17 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 16 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 16 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 16 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 15 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | 15 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 14 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| N London N | London | 14 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 13 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 12 | 0.2% | 0.7× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 12 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 9 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | 9 | 0.2% | 0.7× | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | 9 | 0.2% | 0.9× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 8 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | 8 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | 7 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| SW London SW | London | 7 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| E London E | London | 6 | 0.1% | 0.1× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 6 | 0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | 6 | 0.1% | 1.3× | – |
| NW London NW | London | 6 | 0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | 5 | <0.1% | 0.4× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 5 | <0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SM Sutton | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| UB Southall | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 206 | 4.0% | 0.5× | 68.9% |
| North East | 155 | 3.0% | 0.7× | 66.5% |
| North West | 423 | 8.1% | 0.7× | 64.8% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 441 | 8.5% | 0.9× | 68.9% |
| Wales | 198 | 3.8% | 0.8× | 59.1% |
| West Midlands | 614 | 11.8% | 1.2× | 67.8% |
| East Midlands | 412 | 7.9% | 1.1× | 65.8% |
| East of England | 827 | 15.9% | 1.6× | 71.7% |
| London | 190 | 3.7% | 0.4× | 77.9% |
| South East | 1,017 | 19.5% | 1.3× | 67.9% |
| South West | 720 | 13.8% | 1.3× | 56.8% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed MG MGF tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements Brakes | 5.5% | 2.2% | 2.5× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits Emissions and leaks | 5.1% | 1.4% | 3.6× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Emissions and leaks | 3.4% | 2.1% | 1.6× | 0.0% |
| Service brake performance: efficiency below requirements Brakes | 3.4% | 1.3% | 2.6× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 2.6% | 3.0% | 0.9× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 2.4% | 4.0% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: carbon monoxide content at idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits Emissions and leaks | 2.4% | 0.7% | 3.4× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds default limits Emissions and leaks | 2.3% | 0.8% | 2.9× | 0.0% |
| Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 2.2% | 1.8% | 1.2× | 0.0% |
| Track rod end: ball joint has excessive play Steering | 2.1% | 1.1% | 1.9× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 13.4% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 9.3% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 8.8% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 8.7% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 8.6% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 6.6% |
| Ball joint: ball joint has slight play | 6.0% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 5.3% |
| Flexible brake hoses: has slight corrosion to ferrule | 4.3% |
| Service brake performance: binding but not excessively | 4.0% |