In 2025, 80.4% of Mitsubishi Mirage MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 74.3% for cars of the same age. 7.3% had at least one dangerous defect (7.0% for cars the same age). The typical Mitsubishi Mirage tested was 9 years old with 42,400 miles. Based on 10,732 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
Mitsubishi MirageAll cars first registered that year
Year first registered
Tests
First-time pass
All cars
2021
254
88.2%
87.2%
2020
659
88.3%
85.9%
2019
1,076
86.5%
83.5%
2018
983
83.1%
80.8%
2017
1,218
85.1%
78.1%
2016
1,332
81.5%
74.8%
2015
1,439
80.1%
71.8%
2014
1,673
77.3%
68.5%
2013
2,087
71.8%
65.6%
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
By age at the test
Mitsubishi MirageAll cars that age
Age
Tests
First-time pass
All cars
Typical miles
3-4 years
509
88.8%
87.4%
20,700
5-9 years
5,546
83.7%
79.1%
34,000
10-14 years
4,677
75.6%
65.7%
57,300
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Mitsubishi Mirage is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
under 0.5×
0.5×–0.8×
0.8×–1.25×
1.25×–2×
2× or more
Fewer than 5 tests
None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
Postcode area
Region
Tests
Share
vs all cars
First-time pass
EX Exeter
South West
482
4.5%
4.0×
81.3%
B Birmingham
West Midlands
303
2.8%
0.9×
79.2%
CF Cardiff
Wales
296
2.8%
1.7×
76.0%
SA Swansea
Wales
286
2.7%
2.1×
81.1%
BS Bristol
South West
255
2.4%
1.4×
72.2%
NE Newcastle upon Tyne
North East
224
2.1%
1.2×
82.6%
GL Gloucester
South West
220
2.0%
1.7×
83.6%
LE Leicester
East Midlands
200
1.9%
1.1×
80.0%
DY Dudley
West Midlands
192
1.8%
2.6×
89.6%
HU Hull
Yorkshire and the Humber
189
1.8%
2.5×
81.0%
GU Guildford
South East
184
1.7%
1.3×
82.6%
PO Portsmouth
South East
180
1.7%
1.2×
81.1%
PL Plymouth
South West
163
1.5%
1.5×
79.1%
S Sheffield
Yorkshire and the Humber
161
1.5%
0.7×
82.6%
PE Peterborough
East of England
158
1.5%
0.8×
84.2%
NN Northampton
East Midlands
155
1.4%
1.1×
81.9%
SN Swindon
South West
149
1.4%
1.6×
85.9%
DN Doncaster
Yorkshire and the Humber
148
1.4%
1.1×
86.5%
G Glasgow
Scotland
146
1.4%
0.9×
80.1%
NG Nottingham
East Midlands
144
1.3%
0.7×
86.1%
DL Darlington
North East
139
1.3%
2.2×
81.3%
BH Bournemouth
South West
138
1.3%
1.2×
79.0%
EH Edinburgh
Scotland
134
1.2%
1.0×
71.6%
LL Llandudno
Wales
133
1.2%
1.3×
78.9%
KY Kirkcaldy
Scotland
132
1.2%
2.2×
82.6%
CV Coventry
West Midlands
129
1.2%
0.8×
82.2%
OX Oxford
South East
127
1.2%
1.1×
75.6%
YO York
Yorkshire and the Humber
126
1.2%
1.2×
80.2%
CH Chester
North West
125
1.2%
1.1×
84.0%
AB Aberdeen
Scotland
124
1.2%
1.5×
74.2%
LS Leeds
Yorkshire and the Humber
123
1.1%
1.0×
76.4%
TA Taunton
South West
120
1.1%
1.7×
85.0%
BN Brighton
South East
119
1.1%
0.9×
74.8%
NP Newport
Wales
118
1.1%
1.3×
78.0%
ME Rochester
South East
117
1.1%
1.0×
84.6%
M Manchester
North West
115
1.1%
0.7×
82.6%
NR Norwich
East of England
113
1.1%
0.8×
78.8%
PR Preston
North West
113
1.1%
1.2×
85.0%
RG Reading
South East
105
1.0%
0.6×
81.0%
TN Tonbridge
South East
104
1.0%
0.7×
80.8%
RH Redhill
South East
96
0.9%
0.9×
78.1%
TD Galashiels
Scotland
93
0.9%
4.5×
82.8%
ST Stoke-on-Trent
West Midlands
92
0.9%
0.8×
79.3%
CO Colchester
East of England
90
0.8%
1.1×
81.1%
SO Southampton
South East
87
0.8%
0.7×
79.3%
DE Derby
East Midlands
86
0.8%
0.6×
74.4%
WS Walsall
West Midlands
81
0.8%
1.1×
84.0%
CB Cambridge
East of England
78
0.7%
1.0×
84.6%
WA Warrington
North West
78
0.7%
0.7×
85.9%
IP Ipswich
East of England
77
0.7%
0.6×
80.5%
SY Shrewsbury
West Midlands
77
0.7%
1.1×
75.3%
SG Stevenage
East of England
76
0.7%
1.0×
84.2%
TS Teesside
North East
76
0.7%
0.8×
80.3%
MK Milton Keynes
South East
75
0.7%
0.7×
81.3%
TQ Torquay
South West
75
0.7%
1.4×
77.3%
DT Dorchester
South West
73
0.7%
1.7×
82.2%
E London E
London
72
0.7%
0.8×
76.4%
KA Kilmarnock
Scotland
71
0.7%
1.2×
73.2%
LN Lincoln
East Midlands
67
0.6%
1.1×
71.6%
SK Stockport
North West
67
0.6%
0.6×
92.5%
BA Bath
South West
66
0.6%
0.7×
86.4%
L Liverpool
North West
65
0.6%
0.6×
80.0%
WR Worcester
West Midlands
63
0.6%
1.0×
79.4%
CM Chelmsford
East of England
62
0.6%
0.5×
82.3%
IV Inverness
Scotland
62
0.6%
1.3×
67.7%
UB Southall
London
62
0.6%
0.9×
69.4%
WF Wakefield
Yorkshire and the Humber
62
0.6%
0.7×
87.1%
DA Dartford
South East
60
0.6%
0.8×
88.3%
OL Oldham
North West
60
0.6%
0.8×
81.7%
RM Romford
London
60
0.6%
0.7×
81.7%
TR Truro
South West
60
0.6%
0.9×
83.3%
BD Bradford
Yorkshire and the Humber
59
0.5%
0.6×
78.0%
CR Croydon
London
58
0.5%
0.8×
81.0%
LA Lancaster
North West
58
0.5%
1.0×
75.9%
DG Dumfries
Scotland
57
0.5%
2.3×
86.0%
N London N
London
56
0.5%
0.8×
87.5%
BL Bolton
North West
55
0.5%
0.7×
83.6%
HR Hereford
West Midlands
55
0.5%
1.4×
80.0%
HP Hemel Hempstead
South East
53
0.5%
0.5×
88.7%
KT Kingston upon Thames
London
53
0.5%
0.6×
77.4%
LU Luton
East of England
52
0.5%
0.7×
90.4%
BB Blackburn
North West
51
0.5%
0.5×
78.4%
TF Telford
West Midlands
50
0.5%
1.2×
86.0%
CW Crewe
North West
49
0.5%
0.8×
83.7%
WV Wolverhampton
West Midlands
49
0.5%
0.7×
87.8%
CT Canterbury
South East
48
0.4%
0.6×
79.2%
DD Dundee
Scotland
48
0.4%
1.1×
70.8%
SE London SE
London
47
0.4%
0.6×
76.6%
SL Slough
South East
46
0.4%
0.6×
84.8%
EN Enfield
London
44
0.4%
0.7×
72.7%
NW London NW
London
44
0.4%
0.6×
79.5%
BR Bromley
London
43
0.4%
1.1×
90.7%
DH Durham
North East
43
0.4%
0.8×
83.7%
ML Motherwell
Scotland
42
0.4%
0.8×
64.3%
CA Carlisle
North West
41
0.4%
0.6×
70.7%
SP Salisbury
South West
40
0.4%
0.8×
65.0%
PA Paisley
Scotland
39
0.4%
0.8×
69.2%
SS Southend-on-Sea
East of England
38
0.4%
0.4×
78.9%
TW Twickenham
London
36
0.3%
0.5×
77.8%
WN Wigan
North West
36
0.3%
0.7×
77.8%
FK Falkirk
Scotland
35
0.3%
0.8×
80.0%
FY Blackpool
North West
33
0.3%
0.7×
75.8%
HA Harrow
London
33
0.3%
0.5×
66.7%
SW London SW
London
33
0.3%
0.7×
66.7%
HD Huddersfield
Yorkshire and the Humber
30
0.3%
0.7×
73.3%
AL St Albans
East of England
25
0.2%
0.5×
–
HX Halifax
Yorkshire and the Humber
25
0.2%
0.9×
–
HG Harrogate
Yorkshire and the Humber
24
0.2%
0.8×
–
PH Perth
Scotland
23
0.2%
0.7×
–
WD Watford
East of England
23
0.2%
0.5×
–
IG Ilford
London
22
0.2%
0.5×
–
SR Sunderland
North East
18
0.2%
0.5×
–
ZE Shetland
Scotland
16
0.1%
4.0×
–
W London W
London
13
0.1%
0.5×
–
KW Kirkwall
Scotland
12
0.1%
1.3×
–
SM Sutton
London
11
0.1%
0.5×
–
LD Llandrindod Wells
Wales
7
<0.1%
0.8×
–
HS Outer Hebrides
Scotland
fewer than 5
–
–
–
Region
Tests
Share
vs all cars
First-time pass
Scotland
1,035
9.6%
1.2×
76.1%
North East
500
4.7%
1.2×
81.6%
North West
946
8.8%
0.8×
82.3%
Yorkshire and the Humber
947
8.8%
1.0×
81.3%
Wales
840
7.8%
1.6×
78.5%
West Midlands
1,091
10.2%
1.0×
82.2%
East Midlands
652
6.1%
0.9×
80.2%
East of England
792
7.4%
0.7×
83.1%
London
687
6.4%
0.7×
78.2%
South East
1,401
13.1%
0.8×
80.9%
South West
1,841
17.2%
1.6×
80.3%
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
Mitsubishi MirageCars the same age
Tyres6.1%6.4%
Lights and electrics5.3%8.6%
Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors)4.3%3.8%
Brakes4.2%5.3%
Suspension3.2%7.7%
Body and structure1.4%2.2%
Emissions and leaks1.1%2.5%
Seat belts and airbags0.8%0.6%
Steering0.7%1.7%
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Mitsubishi Mirage tests most often, as a share of all tests.
Failure
Tests
Cars the same age
vs same age
Marked dangerous
Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors)
2.9%
1.6%
1.8×
0.0%
Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous
2.5%
2.2%
1.1×
100.0%
Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Dangerous
2.3%
1.9%
1.2×
100.0%
Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics
2.1%
1.6%
1.3×
0.0%
Ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension
1.4%
0.7%
2.0×
0.0%
Headlamp aim: too low Lights and electrics
1.0%
1.0%
1.0×
0.0%
Tyre pressure monitoring system: malfunctioning or obviously inoperative Tyres
Condition: has ply or cords exposed Tyres Dangerous
0.8%
1.3%
0.6×
100.0%
Condition: has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Dangerous
0.8%
0.4%
2.0×
100.0%
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Great Britain · DVSA MOT tests · 2025
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
Advisory
Tests
Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge
16.7%
Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing
10.4%
Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened
8.4%
Brake pads: wearing thin
7.8%
Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.