Nissan370 MOT results
In 2025, 85.7% of Nissan 370 MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 65.8% for cars of the same age. 3.4% had at least one dangerous defect (8.8% for cars the same age). The typical Nissan 370 tested was 14 years old with 59,600 miles. Based on 1,881 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Nissan 370 cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 85.7%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 65.8%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 2.3%passed after repair
- Failed
- 12.0%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 3.4%same age 8.8%
- Typical mileage
- 59,600at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 72 | 93.1% | 85.9% |
| 2019 | 77 | 90.9% | 83.5% |
| 2018 | 92 | 93.5% | 80.8% |
| 2017 | 90 | 91.1% | 78.1% |
| 2016 | 99 | 85.9% | 74.8% |
| 2015 | 98 | 87.8% | 71.8% |
| 2014 | 84 | 88.1% | 68.5% |
| 2013 | 69 | 85.5% | 65.6% |
| 2012 | 98 | 85.7% | 63.2% |
| 2011 | 286 | 86.0% | 61.0% |
| 2010 | 596 | 83.2% | 59.1% |
| 2009 | 211 | 79.6% | 58.1% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 32 | 96.9% | 87.4% | 25,700 |
| 5-9 years | 444 | 89.4% | 79.1% | 31,800 |
| 10-14 years | 864 | 86.8% | 65.7% | 64,700 |
| 15-19 years | 541 | 80.2% | 57.6% | 74,800 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Nissan 370 is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 47 | 2.5% | 0.8× | 93.6% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 47 | 2.5% | 1.8× | 87.2% |
| RG Reading | South East | 47 | 2.5% | 1.6× | 89.4% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 47 | 2.5% | 1.1× | 93.6% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 43 | 2.3% | 2.2× | 93.0% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 42 | 2.2% | 1.6× | 85.7% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 39 | 2.1% | 1.4× | 94.9% |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 37 | 2.0% | 1.5× | 75.7% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 36 | 1.9% | 1.1× | 91.7% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 36 | 1.9% | 1.0× | 88.9% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 36 | 1.9% | 1.4× | 91.7% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 33 | 1.8% | 1.6× | 81.8% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 33 | 1.8% | 0.9× | 69.7% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 32 | 1.7% | 1.0× | 78.1% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 31 | 1.6% | 1.2× | 87.1% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 30 | 1.6% | 1.5× | 86.7% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 30 | 1.6% | 1.2× | 90.0% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 29 | 1.5% | 0.9× | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 27 | 1.4% | 0.9× | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 26 | 1.4% | 1.2× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 26 | 1.4% | 1.4× | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 26 | 1.4% | 1.0× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 24 | 1.3% | 2.1× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 24 | 1.3% | 1.4× | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 23 | 1.2% | 1.0× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 23 | 1.2% | 1.6× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 23 | 1.2% | 1.1× | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | 23 | 1.2% | 1.1× | – |
| SO Southampton | South East | 23 | 1.2% | 1.0× | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 22 | 1.2% | 1.1× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 22 | 1.2% | 0.9× | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 22 | 1.2% | 1.2× | – |
| M Manchester | North West | 22 | 1.2% | 0.8× | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 22 | 1.2% | 1.1× | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 21 | 1.1% | 0.9× | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 20 | 1.1% | 0.7× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 20 | 1.1% | 0.8× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 20 | 1.1% | 1.1× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 19 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 19 | 1.0% | 1.4× | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 19 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 19 | 1.0% | 1.2× | – |
| BN Brighton | South East | 18 | 1.0% | 0.8× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 18 | 1.0% | 1.1× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 17 | 0.9% | 1.0× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 16 | 0.9% | 1.3× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 16 | 0.9% | 0.8× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 15 | 0.8% | 0.9× | – |
| CH Chester | North West | 15 | 0.8% | 0.7× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.7% | 1.1× | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 14 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 14 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 14 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 13 | 0.7% | 0.9× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 13 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 13 | 0.7% | 1.2× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 13 | 0.7% | 1.8× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 13 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 12 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 12 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 12 | 0.6% | 1.1× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 12 | 0.6% | 1.1× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 12 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 12 | 0.6% | 1.7× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 12 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 11 | 0.6% | 1.0× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 11 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 11 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 11 | 0.6% | 1.0× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 11 | 0.6% | 1.2× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 10 | 0.5% | 1.2× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 10 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 10 | 0.5% | 1.3× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 10 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 10 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 10 | 0.5% | 0.9× | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 10 | 0.5% | 0.9× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 10 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 9 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| N London N | London | 9 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | 9 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| E London E | London | 8 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 8 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| SW London SW | London | 8 | 0.4% | 1.0× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 7 | 0.4% | 1.0× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 7 | 0.4% | 1.0× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 7 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 7 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 7 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 7 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 6 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | 6 | 0.3% | 1.3× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 6 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| NW London NW | London | 6 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 6 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 5 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 5 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 5 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 5 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 5 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IG Ilford | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SM Sutton | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 117 | 6.2% | 0.8× | 86.3% |
| North East | 72 | 3.8% | 1.0× | 88.9% |
| North West | 188 | 10.0% | 0.9× | 83.5% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 156 | 8.3% | 0.9× | 86.5% |
| Wales | 71 | 3.8% | 0.8× | 90.1% |
| West Midlands | 178 | 9.5% | 1.0× | 88.8% |
| East Midlands | 155 | 8.2% | 1.2× | 87.1% |
| East of England | 211 | 11.2% | 1.1× | 86.7% |
| London | 138 | 7.3% | 0.8× | 87.7% |
| South East | 383 | 20.4% | 1.3× | 86.9% |
| South West | 212 | 11.3% | 1.1× | 75.9% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Nissan 370 tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst emissions: Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Emissions and leaks | 1.8% | 0.7% | 2.6× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 1.5% | 2.6% | 0.6× | 100.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a major leak of exhaust gases Body and structure | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 1.0% | 1.9% | 0.5× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits Emissions and leaks | 0.9% | 0.2% | 4.5× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 0.9% | 1.6% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Washers: not working Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 0.9% | 0.9% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | 0.6% | 1.3% | 0.5× | 0.0% |
| Malfunction indicator lamp: inoperative or indicates a malfunction Emissions and leaks | 0.6% | 1.8% | 0.3× | 0.0% |
| Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 0.6% | 1.7% | 0.4× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 13.9% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 6.3% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 5.5% |
| Linkage ball joints: ball joint has slight play | 5.1% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 5.0% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 3.9% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 3.2% |
| Non-component advisories: Nail in tyre | 1.6% |
| Headlamp: has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output | 1.5% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 1.4% |