NissanPrimera MOT results
In 2025, 57.2% of Nissan Primera MOT tests were passed first time, worse than the 59.8% for cars of the same age. 10.5% had at least one dangerous defect (9.0% for cars the same age). The typical Nissan Primera tested was 21 years old with 90,100 miles. Based on 2,451 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Nissan Primera cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 57.2%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 59.8%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 9.2%passed after repair
- Failed
- 33.6%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 10.5%same age 9.0%
- Typical mileage
- 90,100at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 366 | 56.3% | 56.8% |
| 2005 | 519 | 53.9% | 57.5% |
| 2004 | 356 | 59.3% | 57.5% |
| 2003 | 293 | 54.9% | 58.5% |
| 2002 | 207 | 57.0% | 59.4% |
| 2001 | 139 | 64.7% | 60.9% |
| 2000 | 48 | 54.2% | 62.2% |
| 1999 | 156 | 52.6% | 64.2% |
| 1998 | 158 | 60.8% | 65.1% |
| 1997 | 104 | 65.4% | 66.4% |
| 1996 | 36 | 50.0% | 66.9% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-9 years | 3 | 66.7% | 79.1% | 85,400 |
| 15-19 years | 557 | 55.7% | 57.6% | 91,400 |
| 20-29 years | 1,836 | 57.4% | 59.6% | 89,700 |
| 30-39 years | 55 | 63.6% | 71.3% | 87,400 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Nissan Primera is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 77 | 3.1% | 1.0× | 59.7% |
| SE London SE | London | 74 | 3.0% | 3.9× | 63.5% |
| E London E | London | 56 | 2.3% | 2.8× | 48.2% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 52 | 2.1% | 1.6× | 51.9% |
| HA Harrow | London | 50 | 2.0% | 3.4× | 74.0% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 49 | 2.0% | 1.2× | 46.9% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 46 | 1.9% | 1.0× | 60.9% |
| CR Croydon | London | 45 | 1.8% | 2.7× | 73.3% |
| N London N | London | 45 | 1.8% | 2.7× | 62.2% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 45 | 1.8% | 1.3× | 60.0% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 43 | 1.8% | 1.5× | 58.1% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 43 | 1.8% | 1.5× | 58.1% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 41 | 1.7% | 1.6× | 41.5% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 41 | 1.7% | 1.5× | 68.3% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 41 | 1.7% | 0.7× | 41.5% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 40 | 1.6% | 1.4× | 62.5% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 38 | 1.6% | 1.8× | 63.2% |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 35 | 1.4% | 1.7× | 68.6% |
| RG Reading | South East | 35 | 1.4% | 0.9× | 60.0% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 34 | 1.4% | 1.0× | 58.8% |
| UB Southall | London | 34 | 1.4% | 2.2× | 67.6% |
| CH Chester | North West | 32 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 46.9% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 32 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 65.6% |
| NW London NW | London | 32 | 1.3% | 2.0× | 53.1% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 31 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 41.9% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 31 | 1.3% | 1.0× | 54.8% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 30 | 1.2% | 1.2× | 56.7% |
| M Manchester | North West | 29 | 1.2% | 0.8× | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | 29 | 1.2% | 1.6× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 28 | 1.1% | 1.1× | – |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 28 | 1.1% | 0.6× | – |
| BA Bath | South West | 27 | 1.1% | 1.3× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 27 | 1.1% | 1.5× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 27 | 1.1% | 1.2× | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 26 | 1.1% | 0.9× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 25 | 1.0% | 2.3× | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 25 | 1.0% | 0.7× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 25 | 1.0% | 1.4× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 23 | 0.9% | 1.2× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 23 | 0.9% | 1.0× | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 23 | 0.9% | 0.5× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 23 | 0.9% | 1.2× | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 22 | 0.9% | 0.6× | – |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 22 | 0.9% | 0.6× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 22 | 0.9% | 1.5× | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 22 | 0.9% | 0.5× | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 21 | 0.9% | 0.6× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 21 | 0.9% | 1.3× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 20 | 0.8% | 1.1× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 20 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 20 | 0.8% | 1.9× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 20 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 20 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 20 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 19 | 0.8% | 2.2× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 19 | 0.8% | 0.8× | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | 18 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 18 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 17 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 17 | 0.7% | 0.5× | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 17 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| SW London SW | London | 17 | 0.7% | 1.6× | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 16 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 16 | 0.7% | 0.9× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 16 | 0.7% | 1.2× | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | 16 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 16 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 15 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 15 | 0.6% | 0.5× | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 15 | 0.6% | 1.2× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 15 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 14 | 0.6% | 0.4× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 14 | 0.6% | 1.5× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 14 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| SM Sutton | London | 14 | 0.6% | 2.6× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 0.9× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 13 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| W London W | London | 13 | 0.5% | 2.0× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 13 | 0.5% | 1.3× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 12 | 0.5% | 1.1× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 12 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 12 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 12 | 0.5% | 0.3× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 12 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 12 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 11 | 0.4% | 1.2× | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 11 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 11 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 11 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 11 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 11 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 10 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 10 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 10 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 10 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 9 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 8 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | 7 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 6 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 6 | 0.2% | 0.7× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 5 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 5 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 5 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ZE Shetland | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 76 | 3.1% | 0.4× | 47.4% |
| North East | 54 | 2.2% | 0.6× | 46.3% |
| North West | 253 | 10.3% | 0.9× | 53.8% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 144 | 5.9% | 0.7× | 60.4% |
| Wales | 70 | 2.9% | 0.6× | 48.6% |
| West Midlands | 192 | 7.8% | 0.8× | 62.0% |
| East Midlands | 102 | 4.2% | 0.6× | 52.9% |
| East of England | 292 | 11.9% | 1.2× | 62.0% |
| London | 533 | 21.7% | 2.3× | 63.6% |
| South East | 461 | 18.8% | 1.2× | 58.6% |
| South West | 273 | 11.1% | 1.1× | 44.0% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Nissan Primera tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stop lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 5.4% | 3.5% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 4.7% | 4.8% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 4.4% | 3.4% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements Brakes | 4.1% | 2.6% | 1.6× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 4.0% | 3.2% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 3.8% | 3.0% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| SRS malfunction indicator lamp: warning lamp indicates a fault Seat belts and airbags | 3.3% | 1.2% | 2.8× | 0.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a major leak of exhaust gases Body and structure | 2.9% | 1.9% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | 2.6% | 2.2% | 1.2× | 0.0% |
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 2.5% | 2.8% | 0.9× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 18.4% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 16.5% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 13.3% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 11.7% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 10.6% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 9.3% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 8.7% |
| Coil spring: corroded | 8.6% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 8.4% |
| Headlamp: has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output | 7.3% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol | 2,269 | 57.2% |
| Diesel | 182 | 56.0% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.