Rover2000 Series MOT results
In 2025, 84.9% of Rover 2000 Series MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 82.0% for cars of the same age. 4.0% had at least one dangerous defect (3.9% for cars the same age). The typical Rover 2000 Series tested was 52 years old with 62,400 miles. Based on 126 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Rover 2000 Series cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 84.9%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 82.0%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 1.6%passed after repair
- Failed
- 13.5%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 4.0%same age 3.9%
- Typical mileage
- 62,400at the test
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30-39 years | 15 | 66.7% | 71.3% | 74,200 |
| 40+ years | 111 | 87.4% | 82.0% | 60,000 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Rover 2000 Series is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 5 | 4.0% | 2.9× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 5 | 4.0% | 4.1× | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 5 | 4.0% | 2.9× | – |
| OX Oxford | South East | 5 | 4.0% | 3.6× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BA Bath | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BN Brighton | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BS Bristol | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CH Chester | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DH Durham | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EN Enfield | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HA Harrow | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PR Preston | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RG Reading | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RH Redhill | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RM Romford | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SL Slough | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 8 | 6.3% | 1.6× | – |
| North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| North West | 5 | 4.0% | 1.1× | – |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 9 | 7.1% | 1.5× | – |
| Wales | 10 | 7.9% | 1.7× | – |
| West Midlands | 17 | 13.5% | 1.5× | – |
| East Midlands | 15 | 11.9% | 1.7× | – |
| East of England | 20 | 15.9% | 1.8× | – |
| London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| South East | 25 | 19.8% | 1.7× | – |
| South West | 9 | 7.1% | 1.1× | – |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Rover 2000 Series tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non catalyst emissions: emissions carbon monoxide content excessive Emissions and leaks | 3.2% | 1.5% | 2.1× | 0.0% |
| Integral vehicle structure condition: corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body and structure | 2.4% | 0.4% | 6.0× | 0.0% |
| Service brake imbalance: across an axle Brakes | 2.4% | 2.1% | 1.1× | 0.0% |
| Service brake performance: effort inadequate at a wheel Brakes | 2.4% | 0.3% | 8.0× | 0.0% |
| Washers: not working Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.1× | 0.0% |
| Chassis condition: corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body and structure | 1.6% | 0.3% | 5.3× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| Engine oil leaks: leaking excessively from engine Emissions and leaks | 1.6% | 0.2% | 8.0× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp: not working on main beam Lights and electrics | 1.6% | 1.0% | 1.6× | 0.0% |
| Parking (secondary brake performance): on a single line braking system imbalanced across an axle Brakes | 1.6% | 0.3% | 5.3× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 15.1% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 7.9% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 4.8% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 4.8% |
| Wheel bearings: has slight play | 3.2% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 2.4% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 2.4% |
| Transmission oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 2.4% |
| Wheel bearings: slightly noisy | 2.4% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 1.6% |