SEATCordoba MOT results
In 2025, 57.4% of SEAT Cordoba MOT tests were passed first time, worse than the 60.0% for cars of the same age. 9.8% had at least one dangerous defect (8.9% for cars the same age). The typical SEAT Cordoba tested was 21 years old with 105,400 miles. Based on 122 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many SEAT Cordoba cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 57.4%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 60.0%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 8.2%passed after repair
- Failed
- 34.4%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 9.8%same age 8.9%
- Typical mileage
- 105,400at the test
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-14 years | 1 | 100.0% | 65.7% | 93,600 |
| 15-19 years | 12 | 33.3% | 57.6% | 90,000 |
| 20-29 years | 109 | 59.6% | 59.6% | 107,000 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the SEAT Cordoba is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS Bristol | South West | 6 | 4.9% | 2.8× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 5 | 4.1% | 8.6× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BA Bath | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| EX Exeter | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GL Gloucester | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| GU Guildford | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| M Manchester | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ME Rochester | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NR Norwich | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| RG Reading | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SA Swansea | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SK Stockport | North West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SL Slough | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SO Southampton | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SW London SW | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TR Truro | South West | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ZE Shetland | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| North East | 6 | 4.9% | 1.4× | – |
| North West | 7 | 5.7% | 1.4× | – |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 12 | 9.8% | 1.2× | – |
| Wales | 5 | 4.1% | 1.1× | – |
| West Midlands | 10 | 8.2% | 0.9× | – |
| East Midlands | 14 | 11.5% | 1.8× | – |
| East of England | 13 | 10.7% | 1.3× | – |
| London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| South East | 22 | 18.0% | 1.6× | – |
| South West | 29 | 23.8% | 2.5× | – |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed SEAT Cordoba tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stop lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 8.2% | 3.4% | 2.4× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 6.6% | 3.3% | 2.0× | 0.0% |
| Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements Brakes | 6.6% | 2.5% | 2.6× | 0.0% |
| Coil spring: fractured or broken Suspension | 5.7% | 2.0% | 2.9× | 0.0% |
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 5.7% | 4.6% | 1.2× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: too low Lights and electrics | 4.1% | 1.7% | 2.4× | 0.0% |
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 4.1% | 2.7% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | 4.1% | 2.2% | 1.9× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 4.1% | 2.0% | 2.1× | 100.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 4.1% | 3.1% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 19.7% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 16.4% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 13.9% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 10.7% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 9.8% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 9.0% |
| Coil spring: corroded | 6.6% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 6.6% |
| Service brake performance: binding but not excessively | 5.7% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive | 4.9% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 72 | 61.1% |
| Petrol | 50 | 52.0% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.