SuzukiGrand Vitara MOT results
In 2025, 62.3% of Suzuki Grand Vitara MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 59.3% for cars of the same age. 6.7% had at least one dangerous defect (9.7% for cars the same age). The typical Suzuki Grand Vitara tested was 17 years old with 91,100 miles. Based on 18,010 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Suzuki Grand Vitara cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 62.3%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 59.3%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 6.9%passed after repair
- Failed
- 30.8%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 6.7%same age 9.7%
- Typical mileage
- 91,100at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 47 | 78.7% | 71.8% |
| 2014 | 490 | 81.2% | 68.5% |
| 2013 | 1,088 | 75.9% | 65.6% |
| 2012 | 1,037 | 68.0% | 63.2% |
| 2011 | 1,320 | 65.6% | 61.0% |
| 2010 | 1,561 | 64.5% | 59.1% |
| 2009 | 1,526 | 63.6% | 58.1% |
| 2008 | 1,745 | 58.3% | 57.0% |
| 2007 | 1,814 | 59.8% | 57.2% |
| 2006 | 1,463 | 55.5% | 56.8% |
| 2005 | 1,779 | 58.4% | 57.5% |
| 2004 | 1,619 | 59.7% | 57.5% |
| 2003 | 1,078 | 59.6% | 58.5% |
| 2002 | 724 | 59.4% | 59.4% |
| 2001 | 396 | 59.6% | 60.9% |
| 2000 | 163 | 59.5% | 62.2% |
| 1999 | 109 | 45.9% | 64.2% |
| 1998 | 41 | 56.1% | 65.1% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-9 years | 20 | 90.0% | 79.1% | 61,100 |
| 10-14 years | 4,646 | 70.0% | 65.7% | 75,900 |
| 15-19 years | 8,223 | 59.7% | 57.6% | 94,600 |
| 20-29 years | 5,120 | 59.3% | 59.6% | 100,000 |
| 30-39 years | 1 | 100.0% | 71.3% | 135,200 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Suzuki Grand Vitara is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EX Exeter | South West | 641 | 3.6% | 3.2× | 53.4% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 435 | 2.4% | 1.1× | 70.6% |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 384 | 2.1% | 1.7× | 58.1% |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 383 | 2.1% | 2.1× | 52.0% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 366 | 2.0% | 1.4× | 56.8% |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 356 | 2.0% | 2.9× | 66.6% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 343 | 1.9% | 1.5× | 64.1% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 328 | 1.8% | 1.1× | 57.0% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 326 | 1.8% | 1.0× | 63.8% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 325 | 1.8% | 1.4× | 56.6% |
| TA Taunton | South West | 311 | 1.7% | 2.6× | 56.3% |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 303 | 1.7% | 1.8× | 63.7% |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 299 | 1.7% | 0.5× | 67.6% |
| NP Newport | Wales | 283 | 1.6% | 1.8× | 67.8% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 270 | 1.5% | 1.1× | 60.7% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 267 | 1.5% | 1.3× | 64.4% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 259 | 1.4% | 0.8× | 61.4% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 255 | 1.4% | 0.8× | 60.8% |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 242 | 1.3% | 2.6× | 52.5% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 237 | 1.3% | 1.1× | 55.7% |
| SN Swindon | South West | 237 | 1.3% | 1.5× | 55.3% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 236 | 1.3% | 0.8× | 63.6% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 234 | 1.3% | 1.0× | 62.0% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 230 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 67.0% |
| BA Bath | South West | 222 | 1.2% | 1.5× | 56.8% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 222 | 1.2% | 1.2× | 55.9% |
| RG Reading | South East | 219 | 1.2% | 0.8× | 71.7% |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 214 | 1.2% | 0.9× | 65.4% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 205 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 64.9% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 202 | 1.1% | 0.8× | 68.3% |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 201 | 1.1% | 3.0× | 59.2% |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 196 | 1.1% | 1.2× | 63.3% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 195 | 1.1% | 0.6× | 66.7% |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 195 | 1.1% | 1.1× | 49.2% |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 191 | 1.1% | 1.0× | 60.2% |
| TR Truro | South West | 189 | 1.0% | 1.7× | 49.2% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 183 | 1.0% | 0.9× | 67.2% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 181 | 1.0% | 0.9× | 64.6% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 179 | 1.0% | 0.7× | 70.4% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 177 | 1.0% | 0.7× | 67.2% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 171 | 0.9% | 0.9× | 67.8% |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 171 | 0.9% | 1.6× | 62.6% |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 170 | 0.9% | 1.4× | 68.2% |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 168 | 0.9% | 2.4× | 56.0% |
| SK Stockport | North West | 166 | 0.9% | 0.9× | 59.0% |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 160 | 0.9% | 1.9× | 53.8% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 158 | 0.9% | 0.8× | 67.7% |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 157 | 0.9% | 1.6× | 56.1% |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 156 | 0.9% | 1.1× | 66.0% |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 155 | 0.9% | 0.7× | 62.6% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 153 | 0.8% | 0.7× | 69.3% |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 153 | 0.8% | 1.1× | 62.1% |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 152 | 0.8% | 0.9× | 75.7% |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 145 | 0.8% | 0.9× | 70.3% |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 144 | 0.8% | 0.9× | 67.4% |
| DL Darlington | North East | 143 | 0.8% | 1.4× | 59.4% |
| CH Chester | North West | 133 | 0.7% | 0.7× | 54.9% |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 133 | 0.7% | 0.5× | 58.6% |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 130 | 0.7% | 1.2× | 63.1% |
| DA Dartford | South East | 128 | 0.7% | 1.0× | 63.3% |
| SE London SE | London | 128 | 0.7% | 0.9× | 68.8% |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 127 | 0.7% | 1.2× | 64.6% |
| CR Croydon | London | 125 | 0.7% | 1.0× | 75.2% |
| TS Teesside | North East | 121 | 0.7% | 0.7× | 68.6% |
| M Manchester | North West | 116 | 0.6% | 0.4× | 66.4% |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 113 | 0.6% | 1.5× | 61.1% |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 109 | 0.6% | 0.8× | 63.3% |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 105 | 0.6% | 0.7× | 76.2% |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 105 | 0.6% | 0.9× | 72.4% |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 100 | 0.6% | 0.8× | 65.0% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 98 | 0.5% | 0.6× | 70.4% |
| TW Twickenham | London | 98 | 0.5% | 0.8× | 68.4% |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 95 | 0.5% | 0.9× | 49.5% |
| N London N | London | 95 | 0.5% | 0.8× | 63.2% |
| OL Oldham | North West | 94 | 0.5% | 0.8× | 59.6% |
| PH Perth | Scotland | 91 | 0.5% | 1.7× | 60.4% |
| DH Durham | North East | 89 | 0.5% | 1.0× | 66.3% |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 88 | 0.5% | 0.7× | 55.7% |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | 88 | 0.5% | 2.1× | 63.6% |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | 87 | 0.5% | 5.6× | 56.3% |
| PR Preston | North West | 87 | 0.5% | 0.5× | 73.6% |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | 83 | 0.5% | 1.8× | 51.8% |
| LU Luton | East of England | 83 | 0.5% | 0.7× | 74.7% |
| SL Slough | South East | 83 | 0.5% | 0.6× | 75.9% |
| CW Crewe | North West | 82 | 0.5% | 0.8× | 58.5% |
| E London E | London | 82 | 0.5% | 0.6× | 58.5% |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 80 | 0.4% | 1.0× | 58.8% |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 79 | 0.4% | 0.6× | 50.6% |
| RM Romford | London | 76 | 0.4% | 0.5× | 72.4% |
| WA Warrington | North West | 75 | 0.4% | 0.4× | 60.0% |
| L Liverpool | North West | 72 | 0.4% | 0.4× | 69.4% |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | 72 | 0.4% | 0.9× | 69.4% |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 72 | 0.4% | 1.1× | 65.3% |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | 70 | 0.4% | 2.0× | 55.7% |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 70 | 0.4% | 0.5× | 61.4% |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 64 | 0.4% | 1.3× | 71.9% |
| BL Bolton | North West | 63 | 0.3% | 0.5× | 69.8% |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 61 | 0.3% | 0.8× | 57.4% |
| HA Harrow | London | 59 | 0.3% | 0.5× | 78.0% |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 58 | 0.3% | 0.6× | 56.9% |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | 55 | 0.3% | 0.8× | 45.5% |
| EN Enfield | London | 55 | 0.3% | 0.5× | 69.1% |
| NW London NW | London | 55 | 0.3% | 0.5× | 65.5% |
| UB Southall | London | 55 | 0.3% | 0.5× | 80.0% |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 47 | 0.3% | 0.5× | 61.7% |
| BR Bromley | London | 46 | 0.3% | 0.7× | 67.4% |
| WN Wigan | North West | 45 | 0.2% | 0.5× | 46.7% |
| SW London SW | London | 43 | 0.2% | 0.6× | 60.5% |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 42 | 0.2% | 0.5× | 81.0% |
| IG Ilford | London | 41 | 0.2% | 0.5× | 68.3% |
| SM Sutton | London | 37 | 0.2% | 0.9× | 70.3% |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 36 | 0.2% | 0.6× | 66.7% |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 33 | 0.2% | 0.4× | 48.5% |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | 29 | 0.2% | 1.9× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 28 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| W London W | London | 24 | 0.1% | 0.5× | – |
| HS Outer Hebrides | Scotland | 18 | <0.1% | 2.2× | – |
| ZE Shetland | Scotland | 8 | <0.1% | 1.2× | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 1,169 | 6.5% | 0.8× | 59.3% |
| North East | 625 | 3.5% | 0.9× | 64.2% |
| North West | 1,397 | 7.8% | 0.7× | 61.5% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 1,682 | 9.3% | 1.0× | 63.9% |
| Wales | 1,385 | 7.7% | 1.6× | 60.9% |
| West Midlands | 1,814 | 10.1% | 1.0× | 65.5% |
| East Midlands | 960 | 5.3% | 0.8× | 65.4% |
| East of England | 1,611 | 8.9% | 0.9× | 65.2% |
| London | 1,124 | 6.2% | 0.7× | 69.4% |
| South East | 2,867 | 15.9% | 1.0× | 63.6% |
| South West | 3,373 | 18.7% | 1.8× | 55.5% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Suzuki Grand Vitara tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 6.5% | 5.2% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 4.0% | 1.9% | 2.1× | 0.0% |
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 3.9% | 2.7% | 1.4× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 3.6% | 2.5% | 1.4× | 0.0% |
| Stop lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 3.5% | 3.6% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 2.7% | 3.0% | 0.9× | 0.0% |
| Malfunction indicator lamp: inoperative or indicates a malfunction Emissions and leaks | 2.5% | 2.4% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded Brakes | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.8× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint: ball joint excessively worn Suspension | 2.1% | 2.9% | 0.7× | 0.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a major leak of exhaust gases Body and structure | 2.1% | 1.6% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 17.3% |
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 14.6% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 13.3% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 10.0% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 9.5% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 8.8% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 8.7% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 6.9% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 5.7% |
| Suspension arm: corroded but not seriously weakened | 5.0% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol | 13,685 | 62.8% |
| Diesel | 4,314 | 60.7% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.