ToyotaGR Yaris MOT results
In 2025, 92.7% of Toyota GR Yaris MOT tests were passed first time, better than the 87.5% for cars of the same age. 3.2% had at least one dangerous defect (4.0% for cars the same age). The typical Toyota GR Yaris tested was 3 years old with 14,800 miles. Based on 4,275 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Toyota GR Yaris cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 92.7%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 87.5%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 1.1%passed after repair
- Failed
- 6.2%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 3.2%same age 4.0%
- Typical mileage
- 14,800at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1,313 | 92.8% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 2,770 | 92.6% | 87.2% |
| 2020 | 179 | 94.4% | 85.9% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 3,891 | 92.6% | 87.4% | 15,100 |
| 5-9 years | 51 | 96.1% | 79.1% | 23,200 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Toyota GR Yaris is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SK Stockport | North West | 133 | 3.1% | 3.1× | 94.0% |
| RG Reading | South East | 115 | 2.7% | 1.8× | 95.7% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 110 | 2.6% | 1.1× | 95.5% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 106 | 2.5% | 1.8× | 96.2% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 100 | 2.3% | 1.8× | 92.0% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 97 | 2.3% | 2.2× | 93.8% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 92 | 2.2% | 1.5× | 90.2% |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 86 | 2.0% | 0.6× | 95.3% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 86 | 2.0% | 1.2× | 84.9% |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 77 | 1.8% | 1.4× | 84.4% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 73 | 1.7% | 1.1× | 91.8% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 73 | 1.7% | 1.4× | 91.8% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 72 | 1.7% | 1.2× | 91.7% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 70 | 1.6% | 1.5× | 97.1% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 68 | 1.6% | 1.0× | 98.5% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 66 | 1.5% | 0.8× | 93.9% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 66 | 1.5% | 0.8× | 95.5% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 65 | 1.5% | 1.2× | 93.8% |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 64 | 1.5% | 2.0× | 82.8% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 64 | 1.5% | 1.4× | 85.9% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 62 | 1.5% | 1.0× | 95.2% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 59 | 1.4% | 1.1× | 96.6% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 58 | 1.4% | 0.8× | 94.8% |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 58 | 1.4% | 1.1× | 94.8% |
| EX Exeter | South West | 57 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 89.5% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 56 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 87.5% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 54 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 90.7% |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 53 | 1.2% | 0.8× | 96.2% |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 53 | 1.2% | 1.3× | 100.0% |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 52 | 1.2% | 1.3× | 94.2% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 48 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 95.8% |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 47 | 1.1% | 1.1× | 95.7% |
| CW Crewe | North West | 46 | 1.1% | 1.8× | 91.3% |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 46 | 1.1% | 1.6× | 91.3% |
| CH Chester | North West | 45 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 93.3% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 45 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 86.7% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 44 | 1.0% | 0.8× | 86.4% |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 43 | 1.0% | 1.1× | 100.0% |
| DL Darlington | North East | 42 | 1.0% | 1.7× | 83.3% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 38 | 0.9% | 0.7× | 92.1% |
| TW Twickenham | London | 38 | 0.9% | 1.2× | 86.8% |
| BA Bath | South West | 37 | 0.9% | 1.0× | 86.5% |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 37 | 0.9% | 0.8× | 94.6% |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 36 | 0.8% | 1.4× | 97.2% |
| SN Swindon | South West | 35 | 0.8% | 0.9× | 91.4% |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 34 | 0.8% | 1.1× | 97.1% |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 34 | 0.8% | 1.1× | 97.1% |
| WA Warrington | North West | 34 | 0.8% | 0.8× | 91.2% |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 32 | 0.7% | 1.7× | 87.5% |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 32 | 0.7% | 1.0× | 90.6% |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 32 | 0.7% | 0.6× | 90.6% |
| NP Newport | Wales | 32 | 0.7% | 0.9× | 87.5% |
| SW London SW | London | 32 | 0.7% | 1.8× | 90.6% |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 31 | 0.7% | 1.5× | 90.3% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 31 | 0.7% | 0.8× | 90.3% |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 29 | 0.7% | 0.8× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 29 | 0.7% | 1.1× | – |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 29 | 0.7% | 0.9× | – |
| M Manchester | North West | 29 | 0.7% | 0.5× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 29 | 0.7% | 0.7× | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 28 | 0.7% | 2.3× | – |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 27 | 0.6% | 0.6× | – |
| PR Preston | North West | 26 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | 25 | 0.6% | 1.4× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 25 | 0.6% | 1.0× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 24 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 24 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 24 | 0.6% | 1.5× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 23 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 23 | 0.5% | 1.2× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 23 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 23 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 23 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 23 | 0.5% | 0.8× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 23 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 21 | 0.5% | 1.2× | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | 21 | 0.5% | 1.7× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 21 | 0.5% | 1.2× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 20 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 20 | 0.5% | 1.3× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 20 | 0.5% | 0.9× | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 20 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| NW London NW | London | 19 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| TA Taunton | South West | 19 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 18 | 0.4% | 1.0× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 17 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 17 | 0.4% | 0.9× | – |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 17 | 0.4% | 0.3× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 17 | 0.4% | 0.6× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 16 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | 16 | 0.4% | 4.4× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 16 | 0.4% | 0.8× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 16 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 15 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 15 | 0.4% | 0.4× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 15 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 15 | 0.4% | 1.1× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 15 | 0.4% | 0.5× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 14 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 13 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 13 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| E London E | London | 12 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 12 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | 10 | 0.2% | 1.0× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 10 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 10 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | 10 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| W London W | London | 9 | 0.2% | 0.8× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 8 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 8 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 7 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| N London N | London | 7 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | 6 | 0.1% | 0.7× | – |
| HS Outer Hebrides | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SM Sutton | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ZE Shetland | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 381 | 8.9% | 1.1× | 90.3% |
| North East | 174 | 4.1% | 1.0× | 93.7% |
| North West | 477 | 11.2% | 1.0× | 93.1% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 371 | 8.7% | 1.0× | 93.3% |
| Wales | 232 | 5.4% | 1.1× | 94.0% |
| West Midlands | 388 | 9.1% | 0.9× | 92.5% |
| East Midlands | 263 | 6.2% | 0.9× | 92.0% |
| East of England | 385 | 9.0% | 0.9× | 94.0% |
| London | 270 | 6.3% | 0.7× | 93.3% |
| South East | 894 | 20.9% | 1.4× | 93.8% |
| South West | 439 | 10.3% | 1.0× | 90.0% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Toyota GR Yaris tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition: has ply or cords exposed Tyres Dangerous | 2.2% | 1.0% | 2.2× | 100.0% |
| Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | 1.1% | 1.9% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Emissions and leaks | 1.0% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 0.7% | 2.0% | 0.4× | 0.0% |
| Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Dangerous | 0.6% | 1.3% | 0.5× | 100.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a major leak of exhaust gases Body and structure | 0.4% | 0.0% | – | 0.0% |
| Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Dangerous | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.3× | 100.0% |
| Registration plates: does not conform to the specified requirements Identification of the vehicle | 0.3% | 0.1% | 3.0× | 0.0% |
| Tyre pressure monitoring system: malfunctioning or obviously inoperative Tyres | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.3× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 9.3% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 3.0% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 2.0% |
| Condition: has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords | 1.3% |
| Non-component advisories: Nail in tyre | 1.3% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 1.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 0.5% |
| Brake discs: worn, but not excessively | 0.5% |
| Condition: slightly damaged | 0.5% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 0.4% |