ToyotaStarlet MOT results
In 2025, 66.5% of Toyota Starlet MOT tests were passed first time, about the same as the 65.6% for cars of the same age. 6.1% had at least one dangerous defect (7.1% for cars the same age). The typical Toyota Starlet tested was 27 years old with 90,200 miles. Based on 2,862 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Toyota Starlet cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 66.5%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 65.6%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 5.3%passed after repair
- Failed
- 28.2%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 6.1%same age 7.1%
- Typical mileage
- 90,200at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 466 | 66.1% | 64.2% |
| 1998 | 1,024 | 64.6% | 65.1% |
| 1997 | 690 | 64.1% | 66.4% |
| 1996 | 330 | 66.1% | 66.9% |
| 1995 | 38 | 68.4% | 67.6% |
| 1994 | 44 | 72.7% | 68.6% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 3 | 100.0% | 87.4% | 148,900 |
| 5-9 years | 31 | 80.6% | 79.1% | 84,300 |
| 10-14 years | 21 | 71.4% | 65.7% | 100,200 |
| 15-19 years | 100 | 77.0% | 57.6% | 117,900 |
| 20-29 years | 2,573 | 65.1% | 59.6% | 88,200 |
| 30-39 years | 117 | 78.6% | 71.3% | 101,300 |
| 40+ years | 17 | 88.2% | 82.0% | 44,800 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Toyota Starlet is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 113 | 3.9% | 2.8× | 57.5% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 91 | 3.2% | 2.3× | 67.0% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 87 | 3.0% | 2.5× | 74.7% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 81 | 2.8% | 1.6× | 74.1% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 78 | 2.7% | 1.6× | 59.0% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 73 | 2.6% | 1.1× | 69.9% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 65 | 2.3% | 1.7× | 69.2% |
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 63 | 2.2% | 0.7× | 81.0% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 57 | 2.0% | 1.7× | 68.4% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 54 | 1.9% | 1.4× | 66.7% |
| M Manchester | North West | 52 | 1.8% | 1.2× | 73.1% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 51 | 1.8% | 1.5× | 62.7% |
| EX Exeter | South West | 47 | 1.6% | 1.5× | 53.2% |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 47 | 1.6% | 3.2× | 48.9% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 46 | 1.6% | 1.6× | 63.0% |
| BA Bath | South West | 45 | 1.6% | 1.9× | 64.4% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 45 | 1.6% | 1.5× | 55.6% |
| RG Reading | South East | 45 | 1.6% | 1.0× | 71.1% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 43 | 1.5% | 1.4× | 76.7% |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 43 | 1.5% | 1.5× | 32.6% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 42 | 1.5% | 0.8× | 73.8% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 42 | 1.5% | 0.8× | 66.7% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 41 | 1.4% | 1.2× | 58.5% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 39 | 1.4% | 0.8× | 59.0% |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 39 | 1.4% | 1.1× | 69.2% |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 38 | 1.3% | 1.7× | 57.9% |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 38 | 1.3% | 1.0× | 63.2% |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 37 | 1.3% | 1.5× | 70.3% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 37 | 1.3% | 1.5× | 81.1% |
| TA Taunton | South West | 36 | 1.3% | 1.9× | 52.8% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 35 | 1.2% | 0.9× | 65.7% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 34 | 1.2% | 0.8× | 64.7% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 34 | 1.2% | 1.1× | 67.6% |
| PR Preston | North West | 34 | 1.2% | 1.3× | 64.7% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 31 | 1.1% | 1.0× | 58.1% |
| SK Stockport | North West | 31 | 1.1% | 1.1× | 67.7% |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 30 | 1.0% | 1.2× | 63.3% |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 27 | 0.9% | 1.6× | – |
| BL Bolton | North West | 26 | 0.9% | 1.2× | – |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 26 | 0.9% | 0.9× | – |
| SN Swindon | South West | 26 | 0.9% | 1.0× | – |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 26 | 0.9% | 0.8× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 26 | 0.9% | 1.5× | – |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 25 | 0.9% | 1.2× | – |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 25 | 0.9% | 1.1× | – |
| NP Newport | Wales | 25 | 0.9% | 1.0× | – |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 25 | 0.9% | 1.0× | – |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 24 | 0.8% | 0.9× | – |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 24 | 0.8% | 0.6× | – |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 23 | 0.8% | 1.4× | – |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 23 | 0.8% | 1.2× | – |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 22 | 0.8% | 0.6× | – |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 22 | 0.8% | 0.7× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 21 | 0.7% | 1.8× | – |
| DA Dartford | South East | 20 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 20 | 0.7% | 1.7× | – |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 20 | 0.7% | 0.9× | – |
| OL Oldham | North West | 20 | 0.7% | 1.0× | – |
| CH Chester | North West | 19 | 0.7% | 0.6× | – |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 19 | 0.7% | 1.7× | – |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 19 | 0.7% | 0.4× | – |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 18 | 0.6% | 1.3× | – |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 18 | 0.6% | 0.7× | – |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 17 | 0.6% | 0.9× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 16 | 0.6% | 1.5× | – |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 16 | 0.6% | 0.8× | – |
| L Liverpool | North West | 15 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| WD Watford | East of England | 15 | 0.5% | 1.3× | – |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 14 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| SL Slough | South East | 14 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| TW Twickenham | London | 14 | 0.5% | 0.7× | – |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 13 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 13 | 0.5% | 0.3× | – |
| TS Teesside | North East | 13 | 0.5% | 0.5× | – |
| WA Warrington | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 0.4× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 13 | 0.5% | 1.0× | – |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 13 | 0.5% | 0.6× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 11 | 0.4% | 0.7× | – |
| CW Crewe | North West | 10 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 10 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 10 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| CR Croydon | London | 9 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| EN Enfield | London | 9 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 9 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| LU Luton | East of England | 9 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| BR Bromley | London | 8 | 0.3% | 0.8× | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 8 | 0.3% | 1.0× | – |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 8 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| RM Romford | London | 8 | 0.3% | 0.3× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 8 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 7 | 0.2% | 0.6× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 7 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 7 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | 7 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | 7 | 0.2% | 0.8× | – |
| IG Ilford | London | 6 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| SM Sutton | London | 6 | 0.2% | 0.9× | – |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 5 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | 5 | 0.2% | 0.7× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 5 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| HA Harrow | London | 5 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 5 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| SE London SE | London | 5 | 0.2% | 0.2× | – |
| UB Southall | London | 5 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| E London E | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| N London N | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| NW London NW | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| W London W | London | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| ZE Shetland | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 95 | 3.3% | 0.4× | 70.5% |
| North East | 45 | 1.6% | 0.4× | 84.4% |
| North West | 315 | 11.0% | 1.0× | 69.2% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 260 | 9.1% | 1.0× | 66.5% |
| Wales | 129 | 4.5% | 0.9× | 62.0% |
| West Midlands | 237 | 8.3% | 0.8× | 67.9% |
| East Midlands | 193 | 6.7% | 1.0× | 71.5% |
| East of England | 359 | 12.5% | 1.2× | 67.4% |
| London | 104 | 3.6% | 0.4× | 79.8% |
| South East | 654 | 22.9% | 1.5× | 67.1% |
| South West | 471 | 16.5% | 1.6× | 56.1% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Toyota Starlet tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 5.8% | 2.0% | 2.9× | 0.0% |
| Shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak Suspension | 4.4% | 0.8% | 5.5× | 0.0% |
| Service brake imbalance: across an axle Brakes | 3.9% | 1.8% | 2.2× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Emissions and leaks | 3.6% | 2.1% | 1.7× | 0.0% |
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 3.3% | 3.2% | 1.0× | 0.0% |
| Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility (wipers, glass, mirrors) | 3.1% | 2.8% | 1.1× | 0.0% |
| Stop lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.2× | 0.0% |
| Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | 2.5% | 3.9% | 0.6× | 0.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a major leak of exhaust gases Body and structure | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.3× | 0.0% |
| Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements Brakes | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.1× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 15.3% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 13.9% |
| Wheel bearings: has slight play | 12.4% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 12.0% |
| Shock absorbers: has light misting of oil | 11.3% |
| Coil spring: corroded | 9.3% |
| Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread | 8.9% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 8.6% |
| Rigid brake pipes: corroded, covered in grease or other material | 7.8% |
| Suspension arm: corroded but not seriously weakened | 6.0% |