Mazda5 MOT results
In 2025, 52.8% of Mazda 5 MOT tests were passed first time, worse than the 61.0% for cars of the same age. 13.9% had at least one dangerous defect (9.6% for cars the same age). The typical Mazda 5 tested was 15 years old with 104,800 miles. Based on 8,705 initial MOT tests in Great Britain.
RegisterHow many Mazda 5 cars are on the road
- First-time pass
- 52.8%no defects to fix
- Cars the same age
- 61.0%first-time pass
- Fixed at the test
- 7.6%passed after repair
- Failed
- 39.6%needed a retest
- Dangerous defect
- 13.9%same age 9.6%
- Typical mileage
- 104,800at the test
First-time pass rate by year first registered
| Year first registered | Tests | First-time pass | All cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 666 | 65.8% | 71.8% |
| 2014 | 570 | 65.3% | 68.5% |
| 2013 | 716 | 59.2% | 65.6% |
| 2012 | 738 | 57.2% | 63.2% |
| 2011 | 735 | 59.0% | 61.0% |
| 2010 | 1,231 | 48.6% | 59.1% |
| 2009 | 1,013 | 46.2% | 58.1% |
| 2008 | 1,368 | 50.0% | 57.0% |
| 2007 | 1,092 | 45.6% | 57.2% |
| 2006 | 433 | 43.4% | 56.8% |
| 2005 | 115 | 46.1% | 57.5% |
Years with fewer than 30 tests are left out.
By age at the test
| Age | Tests | First-time pass | All cars | Typical miles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-9 years | 237 | 72.2% | 79.1% | 79,300 |
| 10-14 years | 3,703 | 58.8% | 65.7% | 97,400 |
| 15-19 years | 4,705 | 47.2% | 57.6% | 111,000 |
| 20-29 years | 57 | 50.9% | 59.6% | 113,200 |
| 30-39 years | 3 | 100.0% | 71.3% | 78,700 |
Where they’re tested
Colour shows how common the Mazda 5 is among cars tested in each area, against its share across Great Britain: 2× means twice as common as usual.
- under 0.5×
- 0.5×–0.8×
- 0.8×–1.25×
- 1.25×–2×
- 2× or more
- Fewer than 5 tests
- None tested
Postcode area of the garage that did the test, not where the owner lives. Hover over or tap an area for its figures.
| Postcode area | Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Birmingham | West Midlands | 355 | 4.1% | 1.3× | 60.8% |
| BS Bristol | South West | 248 | 2.8% | 1.7× | 44.0% |
| SE London SE | London | 222 | 2.6% | 3.3× | 56.8% |
| E London E | London | 202 | 2.3% | 2.9× | 58.4% |
| PO Portsmouth | South East | 199 | 2.3% | 1.6× | 36.7% |
| BH Bournemouth | South West | 177 | 2.0% | 1.9× | 46.9% |
| BN Brighton | South East | 169 | 1.9% | 1.6× | 52.7% |
| RG Reading | South East | 163 | 1.9% | 1.2× | 49.1% |
| SO Southampton | South East | 159 | 1.8% | 1.5× | 48.4% |
| CR Croydon | London | 157 | 1.8% | 2.7× | 66.2% |
| PE Peterborough | East of England | 151 | 1.7% | 0.9× | 51.7% |
| RH Redhill | South East | 149 | 1.7% | 1.7× | 55.7% |
| TN Tonbridge | South East | 143 | 1.6% | 1.2× | 49.0% |
| M Manchester | North West | 137 | 1.6% | 1.0× | 51.8% |
| RM Romford | London | 134 | 1.5% | 1.9× | 70.9% |
| OX Oxford | South East | 133 | 1.5% | 1.4× | 43.6% |
| N London N | London | 125 | 1.4% | 2.1× | 49.6% |
| LE Leicester | East Midlands | 124 | 1.4% | 0.8× | 55.6% |
| GU Guildford | South East | 121 | 1.4% | 1.0× | 49.6% |
| NG Nottingham | East Midlands | 119 | 1.4% | 0.7× | 46.2% |
| IP Ipswich | East of England | 118 | 1.4% | 1.1× | 50.0% |
| S Sheffield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 117 | 1.3% | 0.6× | 57.3% |
| CF Cardiff | Wales | 115 | 1.3% | 0.8× | 55.7% |
| CV Coventry | West Midlands | 115 | 1.3% | 0.9× | 67.0% |
| ME Rochester | South East | 115 | 1.3% | 1.2× | 57.4% |
| KT Kingston upon Thames | London | 114 | 1.3% | 1.6× | 58.8% |
| TW Twickenham | London | 113 | 1.3% | 1.8× | 62.8% |
| UB Southall | London | 112 | 1.3% | 2.1× | 67.9% |
| NN Northampton | East Midlands | 108 | 1.2% | 0.9× | 57.4% |
| NR Norwich | East of England | 107 | 1.2% | 0.9× | 55.1% |
| HA Harrow | London | 106 | 1.2% | 2.0× | 48.1% |
| MK Milton Keynes | South East | 105 | 1.2% | 1.1× | 55.2% |
| DA Dartford | South East | 100 | 1.1% | 1.6× | 56.0% |
| GL Gloucester | South West | 100 | 1.1% | 0.9× | 45.0% |
| BA Bath | South West | 97 | 1.1% | 1.3× | 35.1% |
| SS Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 96 | 1.1% | 1.3× | 57.3% |
| LU Luton | East of England | 89 | 1.0% | 1.5× | 55.1% |
| NW London NW | London | 87 | 1.0% | 1.5× | 51.7% |
| DE Derby | East Midlands | 86 | 1.0% | 0.7× | 48.8% |
| HP Hemel Hempstead | South East | 83 | 1.0% | 1.0× | 49.4% |
| CM Chelmsford | East of England | 82 | 0.9% | 0.8× | 58.5% |
| SA Swansea | Wales | 81 | 0.9% | 0.7× | 40.7% |
| SL Slough | South East | 81 | 0.9% | 1.3× | 59.3% |
| EX Exeter | South West | 80 | 0.9% | 0.8× | 46.2% |
| CT Canterbury | South East | 78 | 0.9% | 1.2× | 44.9% |
| L Liverpool | North West | 78 | 0.9% | 0.8× | 53.8% |
| CH Chester | North West | 77 | 0.9% | 0.8× | 63.6% |
| CB Cambridge | East of England | 75 | 0.9% | 1.2× | 52.0% |
| CO Colchester | East of England | 74 | 0.9% | 1.1× | 60.8% |
| PL Plymouth | South West | 73 | 0.8% | 0.8× | 47.9% |
| IG Ilford | London | 72 | 0.8% | 1.9× | 69.4% |
| SN Swindon | South West | 71 | 0.8% | 0.9× | 50.7% |
| LS Leeds | Yorkshire and the Humber | 70 | 0.8% | 0.7× | 58.6% |
| TA Taunton | South West | 70 | 0.8% | 1.2× | 22.9% |
| NE Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 69 | 0.8% | 0.5× | 58.0% |
| SK Stockport | North West | 69 | 0.8% | 0.8× | 52.2% |
| EH Edinburgh | Scotland | 67 | 0.8% | 0.6× | 43.3% |
| G Glasgow | Scotland | 65 | 0.7% | 0.5× | 55.4% |
| TQ Torquay | South West | 65 | 0.7% | 1.5× | 43.1% |
| SG Stevenage | East of England | 63 | 0.7% | 1.0× | 54.0% |
| DN Doncaster | Yorkshire and the Humber | 62 | 0.7% | 0.5× | 46.8% |
| DT Dorchester | South West | 60 | 0.7% | 1.8× | 53.3% |
| NP Newport | Wales | 57 | 0.7% | 0.7× | 45.6% |
| LL Llandudno | Wales | 56 | 0.6% | 0.7× | 50.0% |
| SW London SW | London | 56 | 0.6% | 1.5× | 44.6% |
| WV Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 56 | 0.6% | 1.0× | 55.4% |
| BD Bradford | Yorkshire and the Humber | 54 | 0.6% | 0.7× | 53.7% |
| SP Salisbury | South West | 52 | 0.6% | 1.3× | 44.2% |
| WS Walsall | West Midlands | 52 | 0.6% | 0.8× | 50.0% |
| SM Sutton | London | 50 | 0.6% | 2.6× | 72.0% |
| PR Preston | North West | 48 | 0.6% | 0.6× | 37.5% |
| ST Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 47 | 0.5% | 0.5× | 57.4% |
| WF Wakefield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 46 | 0.5% | 0.6× | 56.5% |
| YO York | Yorkshire and the Humber | 46 | 0.5% | 0.6× | 41.3% |
| WA Warrington | North West | 45 | 0.5% | 0.5× | 51.1% |
| BR Bromley | London | 44 | 0.5% | 1.4× | 75.0% |
| EN Enfield | London | 43 | 0.5% | 0.8× | 48.8% |
| TS Teesside | North East | 41 | 0.5% | 0.5× | 39.0% |
| WD Watford | East of England | 41 | 0.5% | 1.2× | 58.5% |
| AL St Albans | East of England | 39 | 0.4% | 1.0× | 56.4% |
| HU Hull | Yorkshire and the Humber | 39 | 0.4% | 0.6× | 46.2% |
| OL Oldham | North West | 39 | 0.4% | 0.7× | 53.8% |
| KY Kirkcaldy | Scotland | 37 | 0.4% | 0.8× | 40.5% |
| WR Worcester | West Midlands | 35 | 0.4% | 0.7× | 51.4% |
| BB Blackburn | North West | 34 | 0.4% | 0.5× | 55.9% |
| CA Carlisle | North West | 34 | 0.4% | 0.7× | 58.8% |
| SY Shrewsbury | West Midlands | 34 | 0.4% | 0.6× | 64.7% |
| CW Crewe | North West | 33 | 0.4% | 0.6× | 48.5% |
| DY Dudley | West Midlands | 33 | 0.4% | 0.6× | 63.6% |
| BL Bolton | North West | 30 | 0.3% | 0.5× | 43.3% |
| AB Aberdeen | Scotland | 29 | 0.3% | 0.4× | – |
| W London W | London | 28 | 0.3% | 1.2× | – |
| LN Lincoln | East Midlands | 27 | 0.3% | 0.6× | – |
| TR Truro | South West | 25 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| DL Darlington | North East | 23 | 0.3% | 0.5× | – |
| HR Hereford | West Midlands | 23 | 0.3% | 0.7× | – |
| FK Falkirk | Scotland | 21 | 0.2% | 0.6× | – |
| WN Wigan | North West | 21 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| FY Blackpool | North West | 20 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| IV Inverness | Scotland | 20 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| DH Durham | North East | 19 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| HD Huddersfield | Yorkshire and the Humber | 19 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| KA Kilmarnock | Scotland | 18 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| TF Telford | West Midlands | 17 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| LA Lancaster | North West | 16 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| DD Dundee | Scotland | 15 | 0.2% | 0.4× | – |
| ML Motherwell | Scotland | 14 | 0.2% | 0.3× | – |
| PH Perth | Scotland | 14 | 0.2% | 0.5× | – |
| SR Sunderland | North East | 12 | 0.1% | 0.4× | – |
| HG Harrogate | Yorkshire and the Humber | 11 | 0.1% | 0.5× | – |
| HX Halifax | Yorkshire and the Humber | 11 | 0.1% | 0.5× | – |
| DG Dumfries | Scotland | 8 | <0.1% | 0.4× | – |
| PA Paisley | Scotland | 7 | <0.1% | 0.2× | – |
| KW Kirkwall | Scotland | 5 | <0.1% | 0.7× | – |
| TD Galashiels | Scotland | 5 | <0.1% | 0.3× | – |
| HS Outer Hebrides | Scotland | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| LD Llandrindod Wells | Wales | fewer than 5 | – | – | – |
| Region | Tests | Share | vs all cars | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | 327 | 3.8% | 0.5× | 46.8% |
| North East | 164 | 1.9% | 0.5× | 54.9% |
| North West | 681 | 7.8% | 0.7× | 52.0% |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 475 | 5.5% | 0.6× | 53.1% |
| Wales | 311 | 3.6% | 0.7× | 49.2% |
| West Midlands | 767 | 8.8% | 0.9× | 60.2% |
| East Midlands | 464 | 5.3% | 0.8× | 51.9% |
| East of England | 935 | 10.7% | 1.1× | 54.8% |
| London | 1,665 | 19.1% | 2.0× | 59.8% |
| South East | 1,798 | 20.7% | 1.3× | 49.7% |
| South West | 1,118 | 12.8% | 1.2× | 44.0% |
Where they fail
Share of tests with at least one failure in each area, against cars of the same age.
A test can fail in more than one area. Failures fixed during the test are included.
Most common failures
The 10 defects that failed Mazda 5 tests most often, as a share of all tests.
| Failure | Tests | Cars the same age | vs same age | Marked dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position lamp: not working Lights and electrics | 8.4% | 4.9% | 1.7× | 0.0% |
| Ball joint: ball joint excessively worn Suspension | 7.5% | 2.9% | 2.6× | 0.0% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | 5.7% | 2.4% | 2.4× | 0.0% |
| Linkage ball joints: ball joint excessively worn Suspension | 4.3% | 1.3% | 3.3× | 0.0% |
| Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body and structure | 4.2% | 2.4% | 1.8× | 0.0% |
| Exhaust system: has a major leak of exhaust gases Body and structure | 3.9% | 1.4% | 2.8× | 0.0% |
| Catalyst emissions: Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Emissions and leaks | 3.7% | 0.9% | 4.1× | 0.0% |
| Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Dangerous | 3.6% | 2.0% | 1.8× | 100.0% |
| Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lights and electrics | 3.6% | 2.4% | 1.5× | 0.0% |
| Shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak Suspension | 3.5% | 1.5% | 2.3× | 0.0% |
“vs same age” compares this model with cars of the same age: 2.0× means twice as often. “Marked dangerous” is how often the tester recorded that failure as dangerous.
Most common advisories
Things the tester noted to watch, which don’t fail the test.
| Advisory | Tests |
|---|---|
| Tread depth: worn close to legal limit/worn on edge | 25.7% |
| Sub-frame: corroded but not seriously weakened | 15.7% |
| Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened | 14.3% |
| Pins and bushes: pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement | 14.2% |
| Brake pads: wearing thin | 12.1% |
| Exhaust system: has a minor leak of exhaust gases | 9.3% |
| Suspension arm: corroded but not seriously weakened | 8.9% |
| Linkage ball joints: ball joint has slight play | 8.6% |
| Condition: slightly damaged/cracking or perishing | 7.8% |
| Engine oil leaks: leak, but not excessive | 7.0% |
By fuel
| Fuel | Tests | First-time pass |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol | 6,262 | 51.0% |
| Diesel | 2,436 | 57.5% |
Fuels with fewer than 30 tests are left out. Different fuels often mean different ages, so compare with care.